### shishyando's blog

By shishyando, 8 months ago,

Again, I hope that you liked all the problems. Share your ideas and solutions in the comments, because there are always different ones! So, the editorial:

A: GCD vs LCM
B: Array Cloning Technique
C: Tree Infection
D: GCD Guess
E: MinimizOR
Who did what?

• +143

 » 8 months ago, # |   +23 Thanks for the fast editorial!
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +19 Also thanks for the fast system testing!
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Thanks for the fastest editorial.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +6 Seems like fast editorials are being the trend recently. A welcoming trend, for sure.
 » 8 months ago, # |   -6 Wow, Fast editorial Thank you very much
 » 8 months ago, # |   -8 Thanks for the fast editorial! And problems are so nice :)
 » 8 months ago, # |   +3 can someone explain D with more details
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +53 Here was my reasoning (same as first approach): 30 Queries to differentiate about 2^30 candidate numbers implies each query must learn 1 bit hence looked for way to first learn LSB, then 2nd LSB etc. Use fact 1 that gcd(x+a,x+b) = gcd(x+a,b-a) if a
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +1 still don't get it.."Say we have learned that x = ?????01. Then, removing the last two bits (by subtracting 1) to get x', and then doing gcd with 2^2 will tell us 3rd bit."If we remove last two bits in x, then gcd with 2^2 will be 2^2.. doesn't matter what 3rd bit is. How do we get whether 3rd bit is 0 or 1?"if we know X starts with x in the first n bits, then doing gcd(X-x, 2^n) tells us next bit."won't the gcd always be 2^n if you remove first n bits from X ?
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +3 You are right. To check bit n, you need gcd with 2^(n+1).I meant to say that you need to check with gcd 2^3. If the next bit is a zero, then the gcd will give you 2^3, otherwise next bit is a one. The rest needs a little tweaking but the idea is the same.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Thanks for the great explanation. But, I think this would need some workaround as 2^(n + 1) would exceed 2*10^9 (if n = 30).
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Yes, if you scroll down, there are some comments about that case.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 why If gcd is 2^n, then next bit is 1, else 0
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Because if the next bit was 0, it would imply that the number has another 2 as a factor. This would mean that there exists a greater divisor than 2^n, i.e. gcd >= 2^(n+1). Since this is not true, if gcd is 2^n then next bit must be 1
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Basically, you should visualize the number in the binary form. Now you can check what is the kth bit if you have Y, with the propriety: X + Y has the first (k — 1) bits set. Now you can check if the kth bit is set by querying (Y + 1 , Y + 1 + 2^(bit + 1) , if this is 2 ^ (bit), then you add it to the answer, otherwise you update Y.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 You can check my comment dowm, I tried to explain D clearly
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +49 Thanks for this rubbish trash boring disgusting fucking meaningless Problem C that I didn't have enough time to write E
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   -70 That's because you are not good enough noob
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   -67 Problem C was nice
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   -9 Totally agreed, Also the question statement is still wrong. He has written ancestor in "where pi is the ancestor of the i-th vertex in the tree". By ancestor, he is meaning parent. He has not even defined this definition of ancestor.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Sonic Speed Editorial
 » 8 months ago, # |   +11 Is there any other solution for A other than [1,n-3,1,1]||[n-3,1,1,1]??
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 I'm not exactly sure, but in n%4=0 case you can make a=b=c=d=n/4
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +3 Yeah, check mine. Looks like I always overlook easy solutions and complicate it more :/.. 153033103
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thank a lot
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 n is odd : (n-2)/2 (n-1)/2 1 1 n is even : 1 1 1 1 (n == 4) 1 3 1 1 (n == 6) n-6 2 2 2 (when n >= 8)
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 n = odd -> x, x + 1, 1, 1 -> (x = (n — 3) / 2) n % 4 = (0) -> x / 4 each n % 4 = 2 -> x, x + 2, 1, 1 -> (x = (n — 4) / 2) n % 4 == 2 works because (n -> 4y + 2) -> x = (4y — 2) / 2 = 2y — 1we get => a = 2y — 1, b = 2y + 1 (2 consecutive odd numbers are co-prime)
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 lol.I thought there were 4 situations when $n = 4k$, $n = 4k + 1$, $n = 4k + 2$ and $n = 4k + 3$. When $n = 4k$ the answer can be k k k k; When $n = 4k + 1$ the answer can be 2k 2k-2 1 2; When $n = 4k + 3$ the answer can be 2k 2k+1 1 1 or 3k k-1 1 3. Then I realized the correct solution and gave up thinking of the $n = 4k + 2$ situation.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +39 why so tight constraint(a,b<2000000000) for d? that forced to think exactly like you which is not always possible;
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 I mean 30 queries points to powers of two so you don't need bigger numbers.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +24 for example, my solution:https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153069764. It is correct if you remove this idiot restriction!!!
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +21 What's weirder is that no tester was competent enough to point this out... what a waste of time.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Same! It took me some time to figure out why I was getting wrong answer on test 1 :(
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please explain why my C solution doesn't work? 153069119
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +8 Failing testcase: Ticket 3684
 » 8 months ago, # |   -15 C is nice . Thanks for the round.
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Editorial's D implementation (1st) seems a bit off. It is not working for x=999999937; Can someone verify?
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 A very educational round with a fast editorial!!! I really like it, especially for the nice E, extremely educational.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +8 In Editorial 1 for D, shouldn't it be $x \pmod{2^{k+1}} = r + 2^k$ ?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 yes
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Can you please prove this? I am getting it as x%(2^(k+1)) = r — 2^k
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 $x \mod 2^{k + 1} = \left(r - 2^k \right) \mod 2^{k + 1} = \left(r - 2^k + 2^{k+1} \right) \mod 2^{k + 1} = r + 2^k$
 » 8 months ago, # |   +7 It seems like my solution for C is different from the editoral, I used binary search
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +3 How do you determine if the tree can be infected in say x seconds (I understand if we can infect it in x then we can infect it in X+1,X+2,...N)? Or can you explain your approach?
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +10 In my solution I don't work on a tree, just all nodes of the same parent are put in a set (and node $1$ is alone in a set) and I make an array for the sizes of those sets, when I infect a set, it decreases by one every second, and for a set to decrease I need to inject it, so I will inject all $m$ sets first (lets say we have $m$ sets), it is obvious I want the biggest set to be injected first, so it decrease more early than the other sets, since I inject the $m$ sets I will use $m$ seconds, if I sort all sets by size, for each $i$ $(1 <= i <= m)$ set number $i$ size is decreased by $i$ elements (the size of the set is the number of non-infected nodes), so I already made the optimal move for the first $m$ sets, I already know now that for every second all sets decrease by one, so I can binary search on the number of extra second $x$, I decrease every set size by $x$, and then I get the summation of the remaining positive sizes of sets, if it is smaller than or equal to $x$ then x is valid (because I have $x$ injections) otherwise $x$ is not valid, and the answer is the $minimum$ $valid$ $x + m$
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Thank you for explaining your approach...
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 you are welcome
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Finally i understood how i can use binary search. BTW better explanation than editorial.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Thank you for the fast editorial and a nice round!
 » 8 months ago, # |   +7 In my opinion,D is much easier than C,since it takes me almost an hour to solve C and WA 5 times,and it takes me half on hour to solve D.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +17 Thousands of people learned today not to use stl::unordered__map in competitive programming. Yeah I used to know about it, but I've been out of the game for so long that I completely forgot lol.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Same, it sucks that the time limits are that tight when asymptotically, one is $O(1)$ and the other is $O(log n)$
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Well, personally I don't think that sucks, just something need to know for participating competitive programming. I'm competing again after three years and it's like a welcome back lmao.
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 I mean u could resort to gp_hash_table if u really need to use some sort of hash map
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 For which question? I'm new to CP and used unordered_map but didn't get any problems? What are the alternatives?
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 You can used custom hash in your unoredred_map for safety. see this : (https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/62393)
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 My solution took 46ms which is also using unordered map. Maybe your problem got TLE because of some other reason! (not sure though!)
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +3 The reason your solution passes is because you are using a slightly newer implementation (C++20 instead of C++17). Try it with C++17 compiler.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   -20 I liked the problem, I didn't like the TL constraints. I mean, it's an algorithmic contest, so when you write O(N) solution instead of the "intended" O(N*logN) you are supposed to pass. But no — since you are using the standard library of a specific implementation of specific language you fail, even though your solution is correct (and will pass, if the system used another implementation of the same language, or even if you selected another version from the drop-down).Let's give problems that exploit specific bugs in the language implementations, yey, so smart, amazing! Too bad the Timsort bug required too large inputs to be viable for a programming contest, it would make an AWESOME problem where you need to sort numbers, but fail if you use the built-in sort.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +6 C was interesting, but I wasn't able to solve it. Thanks for the round!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Thanks for the fast editorial!The problems are nice but I only solved AB T_T.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +3 Problem B giving tle on unordered_map code while got ac using map code. I know unordered_map time complexity is O(n) in worst case and O(1) in best case so should we only use map for safer side? and how to determine where should we use unordered_map or map? thanks in advance.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +6 I think this entry might help(?)
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks.
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hello, I really don't understand what its wrong with my submissions on problem B. The main issues, the reason that i'm writing here, is that after i tried multiple possibilities i copied an accepted code and i still failed.. I've used https://codeforces.com/problemset/submission/1665/153414972 (that its accepted) and it failed https://codeforces.com/problemset/submission/1665/153806087 is that even possible? thanks
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   +9 If you are/were getting a WA/RE verdict on problems from this contest, you can get the smallest possible counter example for your submission on cfstress.com. To do that, click on the relevant problem's link below, add your submission ID, and edit the table (or edit compressed parameters) to increase/decrease the constraints.I've also added 2 new features: Near real-time log streaming and Compressed Parameter editing without using tables. If you are not able to find a counter example even after changing the parameters, reply to this thread (only till the next 7 days), with links to your submission and ticket(s).
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hi! It says that I'm violating constraints, even though I'm pretty sure I'm not: https://cfstress.com/status/3708
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +5 Oh, my bad.Actually, constraint violation is a catch all phrase for when input file is not present. It could be either due to the fact that the generator crashed (i,e. actual constraint violation) or the submission didn't compile (with c++17). (Of course, I could write a better error message, and I'll make that improvement in future).This was the error that occurred while compiling your submission: Compilation Errorsubmission.cpp: In member function ‘int trie::get(int, int)’: submission.cpp:95:19: error: ‘INT_MAX’ was not declared in this scope 95 | int ans = INT_MAX; | ^~~~~~~ submission.cpp:17:1: note: ‘INT_MAX’ is defined in header ‘’; did you forget to ‘#include ’? 16 | #include +++ |+#include 17 | 
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 It works now, thanks!
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +5 Bobrosoft I fixed the compilation error and ran it on the parameters that you had selected. Here's the counter example I received. Input1 3 581769115 379766598 921706393 1 1 2  Expected Output917493727  Your Output379766598 
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks a lot, I was able to fix my code! Although it did make me pretty miserable, knowing how close I was to getting 5/5, but that's definitely not a flaw in the service. :D
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hi, I tried some parameters but it seems no counter example is found. Problem 1665-C, submission 153078042
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +3 Failing testcase: Ticket 4721See first revision to find out how I created this corner case.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 153071478https://cfstress.com/status/3803For problem C, I couldn't find a counter test case.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +3 Input1 10 10 10 1 1 1 10 10 1 1  Expected Output5  Your Output4 
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 For C, I couldn't find a test case that breaks this submission 153256577, (EDIT: I figured it out ~2 minutes after writing this comment lol)
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 For Problem C, I could not find counter test. It's failing on tc-20 Submission ID: 153299261 https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153299261
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4722
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Did you figure out the issue as to why it fails on TC 20?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Contest ID = 1665 Problem Index = C Submission ID = 153057004
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4723
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Contest id: 1665 Problem index: C Submission id: 153157370
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 14 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 1  Expected Output6  Your Output7 
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thank you!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Why unordered map is giving TLE in problem B, but map works?? My solution was basically the same as the one in the editorial, only difference was it used unordered map instead of map.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +5 https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/62393 <- this is why, probably.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks! So it better to use unordered map with custom_hash or map?
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Yes, either of those should work.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 This old blog for people asking about unordered_map
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   +6 I have a solution E that catches ML.Let's build a merge sort tree from tries. Then when we respond to the request, we make a descent over <= log n trues. We go from the highest bit to the smallest. Now let's say there are cnt numbers by which we can go left. Then if cnt >= 2, then we'll just go left. And if cnt < 1, then if cnt = 1, then we add this number to some array b on the left, and we ourselves go to the right. After that, the answer will be found as some b[i] | b[j]
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +8 I used same approach to find answer in the trie, but instead of merge sort tree of tries, u could use persistent trie to find cnt on the segment. This is my solution: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153079376
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +5 It doesn't catch ML though: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153095546. :)UPD: sorry, I probably misunderstood your solution. I had one trie, and for each node in it, I stored all indices in the array that have the same bit prefix.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +8 failed maine test on problem C , WA on test 20 can someone tell what's wrong in this code ?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 3709
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 i failed in test 20 too . can you help me to know why?solution link
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +4 Failing testcase: Ticket 3762
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hey can you help me find a wrong test case in C failing system test 20:Solution Link
•  » » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +5 Input1 16 10 10 1 10 10 12 10 12 12 12 1 10 12 10 12  Expected Output6  Your Output7 
•  » » » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 mine is also failing on test 20 for problem chttps://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153048693please help me find counter test case
•  » » » » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4724
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 can you tell how answer would be 4 for this case 1 9 1 7 7 7 1 1 1 7 this is how the tree looks like 1 / | | \ 2 6 7 8 / | | \ 3 4 5 9
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 I mad the tree but it came into single line , sorry about that
 » 8 months ago, # |   +16 Did anyone AC problem D using the CRT solution?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +48 153047261I used the CRT implementation from this blog.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +17 I'm sorry, but can you please explain the CRT solution in detail ?Mostly i cannot understand 2 things - Why we are using gcd(x+i, x+lcm+i) How can we be sure that 30 queries are enough to fill all the a[i] values. Isn't it possible that the gcd we got in response isn't divisible by any of them ?
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +7 If $gcd(x+i, x+i+lcm)$ is divisible by some integer $y$, then $x+i \equiv 0 \mod y$, in other words $x \equiv -i \mod y$. All the prime integers I’m using as modulos for the CRT (2, 3, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29) are less than 30, so it’s certain that for each of them, at least one integer in $[x, x+30)$ divides it.
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +8 Brilliant !! Thank You.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please check why this solution is giving tle for problem C. https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153076888
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 I used similar solution except with +1 and +3. This way the padding is -1 for odd number and 0 for even.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 unordered_map gave TLE in problem B.. (T T)
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please explain me that what is wrong in my solution to problem c?153064535
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 In C You do two operations every secondDoesn't that mean you do at most 2 operations each second?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 You do two operations : then he specified the two operations, meaning you have to do them both (the two types)
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can't able to figure out the logic of the B problem. When I have used an unordered map it was a TLE at tc 13, but for the same logic when I have used a map it is Accepted. Can anyone help me clear this doubt, I appreciate that.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Check this blog link
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please explain why my C solution doesn't work? Solution
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Failing testcase: Ticket 3794
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 .
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Check out this solution to problem b : 153043206
 » 8 months ago, # |   +1 The 2nd solution for problem D is neat! Thanks!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 For problem C what is wrong with my approach can someone please help me? 153060505
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 3780
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 for this test case how can answer be 4 because in first operation we can infect 1 node only and remaining value would be 7 now we can't take more than 2 nodes at at a time still that means we need 4 operation here + 1 for start so total should be 5?Sorry for negative like on your reply by mistake happened
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Each second, you are allowed to spread the infection in all nodes if they satisfy the condition (and not just one node).Hence, you can have a lot more than 2 vertices being infected every second.
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Yeah, I misunderstood the problem Thanks for the clarification.
•  » » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 In the conditions, it's saying if at least one child of v is infected, you can spread the disease by infecting at most one other child of v of your choice. that means we can infect one more child and according to that, it will take 5 seconds as we have to infect the root as well. Can you explain how 4 seconds will be the answer? my solution it's giving wrong answer: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153433189
•  » » » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 You can spread the infection in each at most child of all parents whose one more child are infected already parallaly. So let's say you have child 2, 3, 4 for parent 1 and child 5, 6, 7 for parent 2 then if child 2 and child 6 infected in each group then each time other child of 1 and one other child of 2 will be infected too because of spread. Long story short it can happen for more than 1 parent at a time that's why it's possible in 4 seconds.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 So many fsts for test case 20 in problem C. Can anyone explain why I got fst on test 20 ? 153064962
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 same i also got wron gon test 20 https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153080174 link
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 16 10 10 1 10 10 12 10 12 12 12 1 10 12 10 12  Expected Output6  Your Output7 
 » 8 months ago, # |   +3 In editorial of Problem D [Solution 1], the value of x mod 2^(k+1) should be r + 2^k and not r+2^(k-1).
 » 8 months ago, # |   +3 I have another approach for E.Let we will solve all queries together.We will go from greater bit to lowest.If we have at least two zeros in a greater bit we have 0 in it in the answer,and we can push the query to the array of numbers,which have zeros at our bit.Otherwise,we push the query to the array of all numbers we have now.This solution works in O(nlog^2) memory and O(nlog^3) time.The every query was in 30 layers one time.Let we will count sum of the lengths of the arrays we process.It is the sum for each element of it's total count.It is at most 30*(count of nodes where element goes to both sons).But if in some node element goes to both sons,then is has 0 in this bit,and it was a query when it is the only zero.But then the sum of (count of nodes where element goes to both sons) by elements is at most number of queries at all layers(each query gives us at most 1)<=30*q,so our soluiton runs in (n+q)*30^2 memory and (n+q)*30^2*log time. (The main moment is that in each node i eliminate all elements,which are not used in queries).So we have much slower solution,but without and ideas:)
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 In editorial of problem D(Solution 1), the condition if gcd = 2^(k+1), then x mod 2^(k+1) = r + 2^(k-1)is wrong and should be if gcd = 2^(k+1), then x mod 2^(k+1) = r + 2^(k)We can verify this since when k=0 (base case), the value of x mod 2 would be r + 0.5 which is wrong.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I can't find a counterexample for my solution even using cfstress.com for problem C. Here's a link to my solution can someone find a counterexample or the error I made — Submission
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 I didn't find my original mistake but instead of finding the final solution using a formula i simulated it manually at the end and it got accepted. During the contest i thought the solution would TLE if i manually did it but sadly turns out it was the right answer — Solution
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone tell me why this solution for C doesn't work? Link Code explanationI count all the nodes which must be infected, (the solution can't be less than this), I will call this count infectthe other nodes (which can be added by spread), let's call them spreadif infect is greater than spread, so the minimal solution is infect because all the spread nodes can be taken in the way of infecting the other cells.Otherwise, I will just add 1 second (the first node which must be added by infection) then the remaining nodes of the tree can bed added two by two (one by infection and one by spread)Thanks in advance for your help
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Even I Tried the similar approach still not getting why it didn't work? 153060505
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 16 10 10 1 10 10 12 10 12 12 12 1 10 12 10 12  Expected Output6  Your Output9 
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thank you.I've figured out that I misunderstood the problem. The spread can go in parallel for more than one node for different parents at the same time.
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 In problem c, After updating the atleat one child of a parent as infect we use ans++ and cnt-1 to queue i think in one time we (spread+inject) so ans+=2 and cnt-2 will be inserted can anyone clarify https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153080174 link to my sol
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 my solution link I know now that the problem was signed and unsigned comparison. Is this supposed to happen? corrected solution link
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I think my solution for 1665E - MinimizOR is hackable: 153083146 In short, I split queries bit by bit, and when I set bit to 0 I also filter the numbers.
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can anyone explain why my C solution is not working? Edited: My submission I'm getting WA in test 20. I already tried cfstress, but I didn't find any counterexample .-.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 16 10 10 1 10 10 12 10 12 12 12 1 10 12 10 12  Expected Output6  Your Output7 
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Ops, I sent the wrong code. Still with WA, but it passed with this input My last submission: My code ;-;
•  » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4725
•  » » » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 tks ^^
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Here's a screencast of me doing todays codeforces round:))
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I really cannot figure out where my solution actually fails? I tried cfstress.com as well with n = 20 to n = 200000, but nothing foundSubmission ID: 153074382
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4138
 » 8 months ago, # |   +7 ENG: D could be done even simpler in my opinion! IdeaWe can find each bit of number easily!Let's firstly note, that: gcd(p,q)=gcd(p,p-q). How can we use it? let's see that gcd(x+a,x+b)=gcd(x+a,b-a) (let's suppose b>a)Let's each step store in 'a' inversed bits of our number 'x' (bitwise "not") + 1 (pay attention to +1!). So that x+a=2^k for some k.So, we start with a=1, and each step 'i' (i=1 to 30) we set b=a+2^i, what's same as b-a == 2^i.So, we see that gcd(x+a,x+b) will be same as gcd(x+a,b-a) <=> gcd(x+a, 2^i)Then, if gcd(x+a,2^i) == 2^i, then, obviously x+a is divisible by 2^i, what means in 'a' there are first I bits of 'x' inversed +1, so because at the i-th step i-th digit of 'a' is 0 it means i-th digit of 'x' is 1otherwise, if gcd(x+a,2^i) != 2^i, it means i-th digit of 'x' is 0 so we set i-th digit of 'a' to 1 to make it inverted 'x' <=> a+=2^i.That's pretty much all. So, what did we do? Each step we found if the i-th digit of number is 1 or 0, so after 30 steps we find the whole number.Code: 153089001P.S. tried my best to explain, if you have any questions, reply to my comment!RU: На мой взгляд, D можно было решить даже проще! Идея:Мы можем найти каждый бит (т.е. цифру в двоичной записи) числа даже проще.Вовпервых, отметим что НОД(p,q) = НОД(p,p-q). Как можно использовать это? Заметим, что НОД(х+а,х+b)=НОД(x+a,b-a) (возьмем b>a)Будем хранить в 'a' противоположные загаданному числу биты +1 (обратите внимание на +1). (т.е. побитовое НЕ). Таким образом в конце мы получим a+x=2^31Начнем с а=1, и каждый шаг цикла 'i' (i от 1 до 30) будем брать b=a+2^i, т.е. b-a = 2^i.В таком случае НОД(x+a,x+b) == НОД(x+a,b-a) == НОД(x+a,2^i)Теперь, если НОД(x+a,2^i)==2^i, то очевидно, x+a делится на 2^i, что значит в все биты 'a' являются побитовым нет первых i битов загаданного числа и +1, а т.к. на i-том шаге i-тый бит 'a' равен нулю, это значит что i-тый бит в загаданном числе равен единице Иначе если НОД(х+а,2^i) != 2^i, то на i-той позиции загаданного числа стоит ноль, после чего мы должны сделать i-тый бит инвертированным i-тым битом загаднного числа, проще говоря присвоить ему единицу, т.е. а+=2^i.Таким образом, за каждый шаг мы узнаем 1/0 на i-той позиции, что за весь цикл соберёт нам полное число.Код: 153089001Пы.Сы. Постарался обьяснить предельно понятно, но если у кого то всё же возникнут вопросы, отвечайте на комментарий, спрашивайте
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 So that x+a=2^k for some k. Why is this true?
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 'a' is initially 1. Each step we verify if in picked number 'x' i-th digit is 1 or 0, so if it is 1 we add 2^i to ans, otherwise we add 2^i to 'a'.So, for example for some x=100110101, 'a' will be = 011001010 + 1 (initial value)So, x+a will be 111111111 + 1, which is 1000000000 == 2^some k
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 When i=30, the value of b would be a + 2^30. But b should be <= 10^9.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Constraints: "a, b <= 2*10^9"Be more attentive when you read constraints ;)
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I’m feeling so dumb right now, I just come up with this exactly solution to the problem B, and I did not submitted because I was thinking that it was not a good implementation, ever you guys felt like this?
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 This editorial is very fast!!!
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 If $\gcd=2^{k+1}$, then $x \mod 2^{k+1}=r+2^{k−1}$ Shouldn't it be $2^k$ in the end?
 » 8 months ago, # |   -21 How can I get the key idea for the solution is that the answer always lies among no more than 31 minimal numbers? why?
 » 8 months ago, # |   +9 I love problem E because it has so many different ways to solve it!
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Can you please explain one thing about E, i.e. why keeping track of 31 min values is required ? why not just 2 most minimums ? answer would be their OR then, because they have lowest max significant bits.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Consider array $[1, 2, 2]$.
 » 8 months ago, # |   +4 Thanks for many different solutions!
 » 8 months ago, # |   +17 Could someone please explain me the "Other solutions" of problem E?I think I don't really understand that.
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +8 Tyyyyyy will be crooked
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Thanks for giving the editorial fast!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone help me, why is my solution for A giving WA?
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 for n=6, you will get 2,0,2,2 numbers should be greater than 0.
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone help why my submission for problem C has FST WA on testcase 20. 153086129 I calculated the time required for injecting one sibling, then tried to spread and inject other.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4726
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can anyone tell why in problem C the answer to the following test case should be 4 and not 5? 8 4 8 8 1 8 1
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 (1 = spread : nothing | infect : vertex 2) (2 = spread : vertex 4 from vertex 2 | infect : vertex 6) (3 = spread : vertex 5 from vertex 2 and vertex 8 from vertex 6 | infect : vertex 3) (4 = spread : vertex 7 from vertex 2 | infect : vertex 1)
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thankyou so much I misinterpreted the problem.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone explain why my C solution is not working? submission
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4137
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 while (am < n) { int d = min(n — am, am); ans += 1 + d; am += d; } Can anyone Please Explain this in Problem B Not able to understand why he choose min.Also even though we take wouldn't there be a chance we end up counting more than required elements
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Problem D, we asked $\gcd(x+2^k-r,2^{k+1})$. If the result is $2^{k+1}$, shouldn't $x\bmod 2^{k+1}=r+2^k$?Or am I mistaken?
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 What brief problems there are! Just like math!
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I really don't understand why my solution for Problem B got TLE on test case 13 when I used hash map. And after the contest when I submitted same solution just by using simple map, it got accepted. TLEAccepted
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thankss!
 » 8 months ago, # |   +24 average CRT D solver
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I'm having some trouble figuring out my error for problem C. I tried printing the test case I got wrong (test 6 case 246) and got: 10 3 8 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 5 Am I missing something or shouldn't this test case be n=11 since there are 10 inputs on the second line? Original submission: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153081192
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 7 1 6 1 6 1 6  Expected Output4  Your Output3 
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 4 →   0 I dont understand why i get wrong-ans in problem C test case 20. I try so hard but can't fix it.Plz help me anyone to fix. https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153127622Thanks.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4139
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 Can you please tell me where my soln is failing for problem C: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153157370
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Getting TLE on test case 5 in Java O(nlogn) solution, can someone tell what's wrong? link
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 can someone explain C ques TREEINFECETION
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 For C: in this input, what should be the outputINPUT:1 8 4 4 1 2 7 4 7should it be 4 or 5 ? if 5 then how ?
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Problem C was so good, Thanks :)
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 If gcd=2^k+1, then x mod 2^k+1=r+2^k−1 else x mod 2^k+1=r.Can anyone explain why this line is true?
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 spookywooky can you explain this part of your code for problem C..!  while(cnt
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   +3 This is simulating the process. The idea is to maintain that priority_queue, where we store foreach vertex the day that all children of that vertex are finished. $cnt$ is the number of days.Initially we put all vertex into the queue. Then, when each vertex has at least one infected child, we infect every day another child of the vertex with the most uninfected childs, and put that decremented number on the q.Note that in the beginning, we have to add an artificial vertex, which is the parent of the root vertex. We need this, because the root vertex also needs to become infected.
 » 8 months ago, # |   0
 » 8 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can someone please tell me where I'm making error for Problem (C)? I have implemented exactly what's the tutorial says. I had figured out the solution but failed to implement it. I have looked at my solution multiple times but don't know what I'm missing. Please help me out.You can look at my submission: https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/153271339I have added comments for better code readability.
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Failing testcase: Ticket 4727
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Thanks for fast editorial
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Thanks for your editorial
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 For problem D, wouldn't $x \mod {2^{k + 1}} = r + 2^k$ if the gcd is equal to $2^{k + 1}$? (not k — 1 as written)?My reasoning is as follows: let $x = y\cdot 2^k + r$. Thus, the gcd becomes $\gcd((y + 1)\cdot 2^k, (y + 3)\cdot 2^k)$. If the gcd is $2^{k + 1}$, that means $y$ is odd. Thus $x = (y - 1)\cdot 2^k + 2^k + r$. Since $y - 1$ is even, $(y-1)\cdot2^k$ can be written as a multiple of $2^{k + 1},$ making $x \equiv 2^k + r \pmod {2^{k + 1}}.$
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 I want to know if the problem A ask you print all solution about n, how can I solve it?
 » 8 months ago, # |   +6 I solved Problem E differently: maintain a trie of all elements of the array: also each node of the trie should store the indices which correspond to the node in the trie: so each index corresponds to $log(A_{max})$ nodes in the trie, one for each bit of the element. Now for a query, we are initially in the root node of the trie. We want to find out the set of numbers which result in the minimum OR. If the left son ($0$ bit) of the current node has $\geq 2$ nodes in the query range, we go to that node, otherwise if it has exactly $1$ node in the query range, we add that value to our set of possibilities and go to the right son. If it has $0$ nodes we just go to the right son.Formally, the invariant maintained is that the union of set of possibilities and the subtree of the current node stores two values which give the minimum OR. Easy to prove, that this invariant is maintained in every step.153497046
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Thanks for sharing your solution. One question though, I think the below code-snippet isn't correct without checking how many of those positions (ie. tr[curr].pos) fall between $[l, r]$. I kind of understand why this works, because if none falls between the given range, regardless of how many of them added, they'll not be part of the answer. Therefore, my point is rather on the correctness of the algorithm. I think the correct way would be using your cnt function to find how many falls in the range. What do you think? if (is_num) { for (int z = 0; z < min(2ll, (int)tr[curr].pos.size()); z++) { possible.push_back(num); } } 
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 thank you sooo much. you are absolutely right. the algorithm is obviously correct, but this implementation detail was wrong, the correct snippet, as you pointed out, is if (is_num) { int count=cnt(tr[curr].pos, l, r); for (int z = 0; z < min(2ll, count); z++) { possible.push_back(num); } } 
•  » » 7 months ago, # ^ |   0 I have a similar solution, but I use Wavelet tree instead of Trie: 153497046
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 Contest ID = 1665 Problem Index = C Submission ID = 153959804
 » 7 months ago, # |   0 https://codeforces.com/contest/1665/submission/154231870problem : C why im getting wa for 20'th case ?
•  » » 7 months ago, # ^ |   0 Input1 12 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1  Expected Output5  Your Output6 
•  » » » 6 months ago, # ^ |   0 please tell where i am going wrong it is giving wrong answer on test case 2 submission
 » 6 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Why does this TLE? I think it is O(n*(log n)), as the priority queue loop runs only while pq.top()>t, and t is being incremented in each iteration. Edit: it is O(n^2) actually. Changed.
 » 6 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Can any one explain why i get tle in this solutionvoid solved(){ int n; cin>>n; unordered_map mp; int ans =0; for(int i=0;i>x; ++mp[x]; ans = max(ans,mp[x]); } ll equal=ans; if(ans==n ) { cout<<"0\n"; return; } int op=0; int unequal=n-ans; while(equal>t; while(t--) solved(); return 0; }
 » 6 months ago, # |   0 can anyone tell me where i am getting wrong answer I cant figure it out 160814737
 » 5 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please help me out what is the error in my submission for C? Although I am writing the brute force approach though?However where is the error? Link:Your text to link here...
 » 2 months ago, # |   0 B:why considering most freq element gives optimal answer? mathematical proof pls
 » 2 months ago, # |   0 Short Solution for B. #include using namespace std; int main() { ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false); cin.tie(NULL); cout.tie(NULL); int t; cin >> t; while(t--) { int n; cin >> n; vector v(n); map f; int maxi = 0; for(int i=0; i> v[i]; if(!f.count(v[i])) { f[v[i]] = 1; } else { f[v[i]]++; } maxi = max(maxi, f[v[i]]); } if(maxi == n) { cout << 0 << "\n"; continue; } int cpyOp = ceil(log2((double) n / maxi)); int swapOp = n - maxi; cout << cpyOp + swapOp << "\n"; } return 0; }