| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 2 | Benq | 3593 |
| 3 | tourist | 3572 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
| 6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
| 8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| 9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
| 10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 8 | SecondThread | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Hello,
I'm solving problem with 2-SAT algorithm and I need to be sure that some xi will be 1 (or 0). How can I make this happen with 2SAT algorithm? When I add "xi or xi", I put xi and not xi into one SCC and 2-SAT returns me that there is no solution. Is it possible?
Thanks
when you add x or x you shouldn't put them in one SCC. because you are adding 2 same sdges.
If you want to force x_i to be true just add implication !x_i -> x_i.
It's simple: BFS over the 2-SAT graph (the skew-symmetric one) from the fixed variables while checking for contradictions. When it finishes, there will be no edge from a known variable to an unknown one. The skew-symmetricity makes sure that there's no unfixed variable from which a fixed variable can be reached afterwards, so any solution of the unfixed part of the graph + the variables you fixed this way is a solution of the original problem.