Can someone help me to solve this problem ? I try trie with sets in each vertex. It is TLE. how to reduce time?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
2 | Benq | 3580 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
10 | jiangly | 3467 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Can someone help me to solve this problem ? I try trie with sets in each vertex. It is TLE. how to reduce time?
Name |
---|
Maybe ternary search trie instead of a normal trie. Note I did not read the problem.
What is ternary search trie?..
from what I tried:
Persistent trie: per query, AC, 0.61s
It's clear how to solve using segment tree storing sorted arrays in each vertex in O(n·log(n)) memory and O(log2(n)·log(maxX)) time per query.
But I haven't a clue how to solve it using persistent segment tree, can you explain please?
Non persistent trie , AC, 0.75s
Used vectors in each vertex instead of sets.