### omgcoin's blog

By omgcoin, history, 3 years ago, ,

I spent more than 10 months of consistent training (almost every day, every week) and I have no improvement at all.

Yesterday, my rating is dropped below the level where I was 12th October 2015 (a day of my first contest).

Usually, during contests, I can solve Div2 A for 10-15 minutes, Div2 B for 20-30 minutes, rarely I can solve Div2 C when it's easy. I was at that level in October 2015 and I'm on the same level right now (August 2016).

I still can't solve Div2 C problems and I'm still can't solve problem B quickly without mistakes or being hacked.

So I have zero progress, zero improvement of my problem solving skills after 10 months of almost every day training.

I think there is something definitely wrong with my training method because it's absolutely ineffective.

I'm looking for training advice from experienced participants because I don't want to spent another 10 months and end up exactly at the same level where I was 10 months ago.

My background: I'm working as C/C++ developer since 2009 (early days I was mainly C developer, currently I mostly C++11 developer).

Here is detailed description of my training program:

Every time I'm training on CodeForces, I set up timer for K number of minutes (where K%15 == 0). For me, it's psychologically easier to not to be distracted during specific time frame. Also, I have a journal where I put how much minutes I spent on training every day (including contest time). I keep only "clean" time in my journal, i.e. time when I was not distracted at all. I work in silence and don't listen music during training.

Also, I keep a journal of solved "hard" problems (every entry: day => number of solved problems, usually just one). I consider a problem as hard when the problem level >= Div2 C. I consider hard problem as solved in two cases:

1. I solved problem without any hint;
2. I looked at tutorial, then put off problem for a few days, and after try to recreate solution, and make sure that I feel confident that I really understand solution;

I don't consider hard problem as solved if I implement it immediately after I read tutorial or when I don't feel confident that I really understand solution.

I started training on 10th October 2015.

Since 20th February 2016 I keep journal of how much time I spent. Since 11th May 2016 I keep journal of how much hard problems I solved.

Here is my fresh statistics of training:

I spent 89.45 hours in last 93 days (from May 24th till August 24th). It's about 0.96 hours per day in average or 6.73 hours per week in average.

I solved 26 hard problems in last 93 days. It's about 1 hard problem in 3.57 days or 1 problem in 3.44 hours (often combined time for a few days).

Usually, I can train 15, 30 or 45 minutes in the morning before work and 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 minutes in the evening after work.

I'm keeping TODO list of C problems by adding CodeForces rounds to favorites. Usually I add about 20 rounds to favorites (when list is empty) and then work on them starting from down to top of the list till it becomes empty. If I put off problem for a while, I remove from favorites and add it again so that problem will be on top of the list (since I take problems from back of the list).

Typical workflow on problem Div2 C (note that steps could be split into several days):

1. Trying to solve problem for 1.5 hours (could be split into two days);
2. Look to tutorial for a hint. It means I can read only first few sentences of tutorial till I get the idea of how to solve problem but don't read entire tutorial. For example, I can read that solution uses two dimensional DP array with states k, m. After that I'm trying to came up with rest of solution on my own;
3. If I'm still can not solve after another hour, I read tutorial and comments till I understand idea of solution. It could take hour, two, three during several days till I really understand what tutorial is talking about;
4. When I finally understand solution, I put off this problem for a while (i.e. put to the top of the list). After a while, I check whether or not I really understood solution. If I can easily recreate solution after one or two weeks, then I really understand;
5. I usually can't solve C problems without hints from tutorial. Sometimes, I can't even solve it with tutorial since I don't understand solution at all. In this case I drop the problem for uncertain period of time (i.e. remove from my TODO list);

So usually, my work on a problem Div2 C can take quite a while. For example:

Day 1: Spend 1.5 hour, can not solve;

Day 2: Look for a hint, try to solve with a hint for another 0.5 hours. Still can not solve;

Day 3: Look at tutorial of the problem and all comments for 1 hour, finally understood solution, put off problem for a few days;

Day 4 (after a few days or weeks): Spend 1 hour to implement solution;

Possible reasons of inefficiency of my training program:

1. I spent too few hours per day on average. ~1 hour per day is not enough. It will take years till my rating become stable blue;
2. I spent too much time on Div2 C problems. 26 problems in 93 days is ridiculously low number. I should somehow solve 26 problems in two weeks, not 93 days to get any measurable progress;

Please, help to fix my training program.

The 'science' of training in competitive programming

How to come up with the solutions: techniques

I know things like zone of proximal development

The problem is that Div2 B is too easy (more than 90% of success) while Div2 C is too hard (low success rate). It's too big gap between B and C.

• +160

 » 3 years ago, # |   0 Auto comment: topic has been updated by omgcoin (previous revision, new revision, compare).
 » 3 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 Comments here can be really helpful :)http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/2332also check this :http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/17842http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/16599
 » 3 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   +21 The question has been asked before, so I take it that you have read the other blogs. I personally would recommend you to spend more time on harder tasks (let's say Div2 C/D/E), this w/ay you learn new ideas. Also explore "standard" topics such as graphs(not just bfs/dfs but also algos like Prim, Dijkstra, LCA) , dynamic programming, etc. Try not just to learn them by heart, but to understand how and why they work. Many graph problems are just adaptations of already known algorithms. You must first learn the theory, then practice. I think that you set aside enough time to improve(well, maybe not enough for becoming red, but you can definitely become purple). And the most important, have fun while solving problems :)
•  » » 3 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Hi!I am a beginner. What do you mean by this line"Try not just to learn them by heart, but to understand how and why they work. Many graph problems are just adaptations of already known algorithms." Should one memorize/by heart some implementations? What do you mean learning by heart here? I mostly try to understand the logic behind the algorithm/ data structure, then see it's implementation. Then, i do problems. Can you elaborate on what is your basic approach of learning new algorithms and data structures? How should I learn so that I can implement it fast in the future if required? You can message me instead of commenting here. Thanks!
•  » » » 3 months ago, # ^ |   0 When I want to learn a new algorithm, I first read the theory behind it, try to understand the basic concepts it is using, etc. Then, I usually try to implement it on my own first, to be sure I have understood everything. If I get stuck (for ex. I couldn't implement a treap the first time), I search for some good implementations on the internet. Once you're done with that, try to solve a problem with the implemented algorithm, and search for faster/shorter implementations. Sometimes the final solution turns out to be a mix of what I find online and what I wrote myself. Plus, by looking at other solutions, you improve your implementation skills. But never forget, you should understand every line of the final implementation — otherwise, you'd have a difficult time tweaking the algorithm for other problems.About learning to implement it fast, I recommend trying to implement the algorithm for different tasks without looking at your previous code, preferably on the next few days after you have learned an algorithm (if you make a month pause between learning the algorithm and practicing it a bit, you have a high chance of forgetting it). Here you also get a chance to see if you really understood the algorithm + implementation, and that you can tweak them when needed (so try to pick also harder problems with that algorithm).Final note, for online competitions or ICPC, you can just have a library of all algorithms you've learned and implemented yourself, and copy them when needed.
•  » » » » 3 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks a lot.
 » 3 years ago, # |   +5 http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/46304 contains the rating of CF problems ... you can start from rating 1800
 » 3 years ago, # |   +37 Go to acm.timus.ru and solve 500 problems there. You will be violet after that.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 Actually, i don't think 500 is enough... I will test it, after I finish my 500th problem on timus.
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +1 Maybe SGU
•  » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Did you?
•  » » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   +3 I got violet, but I don't think strategy "solve 500 on timus" is best for achieving some rating on codeforces. However, you can try it, it will definitely help you.
•  » » » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Is it because times is toughest judge??then which one is toughest?
•  » » » » » » 2 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hi Emiway, would you like to collab ?
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +3 I don't understand what's the point to solve problems on acm.timus.ru instead of CodeForces.Timus doesn't have tutorials, so it will take me forever to solve 500 problems.I took two contests on Timus. After contest, I just abandoned problems I didn't solve during contest since there is no tutorial and I have no idea how to solve them.If get stuck and there is no tutorial, it will take weeks till I came up with solution (if came up at all).So in order to solve 500 hard problems without any manual, I have to spend up to 40 years!My whole problem is that my pace of solving problems (even with tutorial!) is ridiculously slow (23 Div2 C problems in 93 days). And I don't know how to fix this.
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +35 there is no tutorial and I have no idea how to solve them It's the key thing! You get used to read editorials too early. But you don't have editorials on real contests! If you don't know how to solve a problem, postpone it. There are always problems you can solve. Learn new algorithms and tricks in parallel. Try to invent approaches on your own, it helps a lot. Someday you remember an old problem that you couldn't solve before and get AC with the help of new knowledge.The other thing is that Timus doesn't allow you to watch tests. On Codeforces your desire to see what's wrong is too high, and you can't reject it. Then you get stuck in a round cause you don't know what to do without watching tests.That's how it worked for me. I have 477 now, but I didn't solve much of last two pages. I reached stable 1900+ rating when I had 350 or something like that (taking into account that a lot of easy problems are added, this number is 450-500 now)
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +2 I understand what you are talking about. I think it does make sense.Although I have a question about this approach. In particular: Try to invent approaches on your own, it helps a lot. But I can't invent everything on my own. For example, Dijkstra invented shortest path algorithm, Fenwick invented binary indexed tree, Knuth, Morris and Pratt invented string searching algorithm. And they are famous scientists.If I know nothing, I can not become simultaneously Dijkstra, Fenwick, Knuth, Morris and Pratt. It's just unrealistic since even Donald Knuth get most of his ideas from other fellow scientists. I.e. it's impossible invent all classics independently in human lifetime. I think science (at least modern) is all about sharing and invent new ideas on top of ideas from predecessors.I think I should read classic books about algorithms a lot in order to be able to invent some form of modified Dijkstra algorithm etc.In order to solve 500 problems within two years. How much you recommend to struggle on single problem if I get stuck before put problem off?
•  » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 I strongly agree with you.I used your method of trying to come up with solution on my own for years. It is too slow.Actually, I've been planning to try the opposite — make a list of 50 medium problems (div2c, div2d) and try to come up with solution only for 10 or 15 minutes. After that open the solutions of Nutella coders and read till fully comprehended.Currently, I don't have enough time because of the tight schedule on my work, but I think I might have a free week in October.
•  » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +12 I can't invent everything on my own I meant not these famous algorithms, but rather simple tricks like coordinates compression or "process N queries a[L..R] += d, then output all a[i]". You can't read about these tricks in books but they are not very hard and extremely useful. How much you recommend to struggle on single problem if I get stuck before put problem off? I didn't spend more than 1 day, but unsolved problems always floated up in my mind passively. If you can't solve a problem now — it's just too hard for you. Try other problems and get your XP. Remember: there are always problems you can solve. It's all like in computer games: if you can't beat the boss now, don't try again and again, better go earn your level and equipment first.
•  » » » » » 3 months ago, # ^ |   0 :|What?
•  » » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Is it because times is toughest judge??then which one is toughest?
•  » » » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Because it has good problems for everyone
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 Is it specific to Timus only and not Uva?
•  » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Do you follow CP3 book?
 » 3 years ago, # |   +13 Solving random problems is not a good practice strategy. By doing this, you learn a lot of new techniques and algorithms, but you forget about them immediately because you never applied them (except the single time when you learned it). Picking a topic and practicing it is much better. At https://a2oj.com/categories you can find lots of problems for each topic, sorted by difficulty. I suggest starting with one topic (e.g. dynamic programming) and doing problems for this one category for some time (2 weeks or longer). As long as it takes you to get comfortable with it. Then change to the next topic.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 I've asked different persons about this strategy (pick a technique , study it and solve problems on that technique.) and it turns out to be a bad practice when to solve problems while you already know its technique . I've always been suggested to just try as much as I can with a problem and then if I can't yet solve it , I can check editorials or see tags about which algorithm should I know to solve this problem . Then study this algorithm and solve the problem.
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +5 I said "As long as it takes you to get comfortable with it.". I don't that the OP is completely understands every detail of the technique when he solves it once with the help of the editorial. I know, that I don't. The topic/technique can come up in different forms. For instance, if you only solved a handful of DP problems (with help), you'll probably not recognize the next DP as such. DP has so many different looks. Another thing is the following aspect. If I learn a new algorithm in an editorial, I probably can't code it again the next day. Especially if it is a little bit strange (BIT, KMP). But after doing 10 BIT problems in a week, I now can code the algorithms in my sleep. Solving one problem doesn't make you master the technique. It takes a lot of repetition and practice.
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +3 You're right (Y)
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +3 also after trying as much as I can with a prob , search for the algorithm , study it & solve the prob , like u said I can keep digging with the same algorithm and solve problems until am comfortable with this algorithm . after that I can keep going solving problems WITHOUT knowing the algorithm . and keep looping ;) all am saying is : - solving problem without any clue about its algorithm is necessary .
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 4 →   +10 There is a course on coursera called Learning how to learn. They called the method that you described as cramming and they said that it is a bad strategy in the long run.Instead they proposed to solve problems randomly. This technique is called spaced repetition.These are not my thoughts. This is what you'll learn if you participate in that course. They talk about it with much more detail. They also cover how our brain works, so that one could understand why we should prefer one technique over the other.
 » 3 years ago, # |   -13 I think you waste a lot of time thinking. You should try to think 10-15 minutes on a problem and if you don't have any ideas, just read the editorial. In a such a manner, you will get more "information" in less time.
 » 3 years ago, # |   +12 due to my experience, i can suggest you train as afaxnraner said. try to acquire basic techniques first then move on to solving random div2 C problems. you can see this comment.as an example you said that if you couldn't solve a problem you see the editorial and sometimes it took a lot of time for you to understand the editorial. well, let's assume that the problem is about DP, if you are not familiar enough with DP you will have a hard time understanding the editorial (DP is real magic when you first learn it). on the other hand, if you are familiar enough with DP. understanding DP solution will not be that hard at all. you just see the definition of the state and the transition and that's all you want to understand the solution. this argument is due to my own view and experience. it might not be applicable for your situation. i hope it helps you a little :)
 » 3 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Well,i'm not so strong but as far as i can suggest is to read ikatanic's comment.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 Do you have such a friend ? (Related to ikatanic's comment)
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +5 geniucos solved +1500 problems,but i believe it is possible to become red without solving so much problems,for example solving the easiest 100 problems from 10 judges won't increase your level while solving all the problems from POI (there are ~450) will increase your level a lot.
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +1 My whole problem is that my pace of training is extremely slow.I actually do exactly what ikatanic said in comment you mentioned.Quote from his comment: Actually most important thing is to solve problems you usually can't solve, to think about the solution and make everything clear in your head. If you just solve the problem but some things in it are not really clear to you it doesn't mean anything, next time you see similar problem you won't solve it, you won't be able to use what you should've learned while solving that problem. That's exactly what I'm doing right now.And using this method I solved only 26 problems in 93 days. It means in order to solve 1000 problems, I should spent 9 years and 9 months. That's my big problem!
•  » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 9 years and 9 months isn't accurate since you'll probably solve problems faster and faster, I think that if you'd train hard for more than 2h/day you should be able to reach 1000 problems in like 1-2 years max.
•  » » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 That's how I thought 10 months ago (that I speed up).The problem (a big problem!) is that I didn't speed up in last 10 months.So I solve Div2 C problems as slow as 10 months ago.Something is definitely wrong with my training.
•  » » » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 Well, when I train I usually don't spend around 1.5h on a problem, if I don't have any idea how to solve it I usually read the editorial after 15-20mins max sometimes I don't even bother to write the code, I just try my best to understand the key idea of the problem and then move on and consider that problem as solved.Also I think that participating in as many contests as possible is good ( CF standard round + education, csacademy's rounds and so on).P.S.: I've gone from struggling to solve problem B ( 4 months ago ) to solving A-B-C easily ( almost every time ) during the contest and I either solve D during the contest or several minutes after, so my training routing seems to be working so far.
•  » » » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +16 One of the idea I used to train for competitive programming is timing how much time it takes for me to solve the problem. After about a month, I comfortably get 2x speed improvement.Why? Because it's vague to see why you are slow. Maybe there's some knowledge you are missing. Maybe it's your coding skills. Maybe your thinking is not clear enough. Timing the problems allow you to see clearly what's going on under the hood, and forces you to work on what you are weak at. I don't know what's your weak spot, but typically in programming contests you are bound by your weakest spot, and only by improving such point you can grow better.
•  » » » » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +5 Thank you for advice!What exactly do you mean by: Timing the problems allow you to see clearly what's going on under the hood How to use this in my practice?
•  » » » » 17 months ago, # ^ |   0 Is it because POI is toughest judge??then which one is toughest?
 » 3 years ago, # |   +9 Just curious, outside of programming contests, how much do you feel that this practice has helped you in becoming a better programmer?
 » 3 years ago, # |   -26 Just give up
 » 3 years ago, # |   +2 I think spending some time solving educational rounds question (especially beyond D) is a good idea, there are a few good sample questions for learning new algorithms.Also,focusing on one topic is an effective way to practice. Try to read the editorial of the first question, after implementing the editorial and fully understanding it and how it was came up with then try other questions of the same topic. I think this should be better than scratching your head for 1.5 hours with nothing done.Most importantly, you should read more hard questions, even if you aren't confident in getting AC for certain questions, you should still submit your code to seek flaws from the tests. Test cases help a lot in fixing logic loopholes than yourself. Moreover, you can gain experience of implementing some algorithms, and make sure you don't have to waste time learning it again just because you have forgot it.
 » 3 years ago, # |   +61 It's not about efficiency. However, it's about quantity. ~0.96 hours per day may be too little for newbie (excluded talent). I suggest to train at least two hours and solve >= 1 you so-called hard problem a day.And I think the dark time'' is also very important for significant improvement. When you are walking, you are eating, and you are taking shower, keep one or two unsolved problems in your brain and try to think of them. It's the best way I have ever found to utilize the time.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 I suggest to train at least two hours and solve >= 1 you so-called hard problem a day. Currently, I spend about 1.5-2 hours for a problem Div2 C before looking to a tutorial. Then about 1-2 hours to understand a tutorial and implement solution. I.e. it's about 4 hours to completely understand and solve a problem (more detailed explanation how I do this in my post).I'm too slow to solve 1 problem within two hours every day.What do you recommend to do to speed up? Would you recommend to look at tutorial earlier (i.e. after 30 minutes if I get stuck)? Or may be I should solve problems by topic to speed up?
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +2 If you are reading the tutorial early then make sure that you thoroughly understand the solution, it's easy to pick up a bad habit of missing out something important that make sure the algorithm works.
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +1 I think I will put off problem after reading tutorial and get back to the problem after one week so that I will make sure I can implement it after a while.
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +1 If you spend 4 hours to solve the Div2 C even with an editorial, you set the bar too high... Try to find such difficulty level that you can solve 50% of problems in that difficulty level within one hour on your own, and solve as many problems of that difficulty as you can. If you manage to do this you will progress... may be not as fast as you'd like, but I am sure you will.
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 I can solve div2 C within an hour 80% of the time. But, when it comes to div2 D, i have almost no idea. Any tips for me ?
•  » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 You can try to use this list to find CF problems that correspond to your rating.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +4 "When you are walking, you are eating, and you are taking shower, keep one or two unsolved problems in your brain" This is really helpful , I always do this and eventually got AC for such a problem . This comment should be upvoted twice :D
 » 3 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +38 I'll second the poster above me -- 26 problems in 93 days is absurdly small, so you definitely need to up the quantity a little. As a ballpark, you want to reach at least something around 500 to improve, and you'll take a very long time to get there in this current pace.As for topic-based training, every red coder I've seen comment about it seems to dismiss the idea. I don't know if it's possible to get better from it, but it's certainly not necessary.(edit to make it sound less harsh than it probably came across as the first time)
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 I understand that it's absurdly small number. I understand I need to solve ~500 problems to improve. But I don't understand how to speed up.What I should change in my training to solve 93 Div2 C problems in 93 days? Should I look to tutorial/editorial earlier (i.e. may be after 30 minutes instead of 2 hours)?Why sorting problems by topic is bad idea? Sounds good idea to speed up?
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +9 If you're short on time, maybe you could do what ftiasch suggested and read a problem, then use your downtime during the day to think about it. Then when you actually come to practice time you should have already thought a lot about that problem. I would read the tutorial earlier too, 4 hours is too long to spend in a single problem. The optimal time should be when you stop making relevant progress, so I can't specify it for you, but I believe I spent about an hour per problem when I was starting out, and this counts implementation too.When you see a problem you should be trying to simplify it as much as you can, and then the simplified problem is either very easy to solve or you can apply some well known technique. A second advantage of random solving is that you will meet techniques in the same proportion that they are relevant.Solving problems by topic doesn't teach a lot of problem solving, because it tends to lead to the "going through a list of known techniques to see which one of them applies" approach (and then if none of them apply, what do you do?). Problems in contests don't have signs saying "this should be solved using DP", so you need to learn to simplify problems without this help.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +4 I think topic-based training is somewhat useful in learning new technique, especially data structures. It doesn't teach you how to solve a problem, but it helps you code faster and more accurately. It shouldn't be done too much though.
 » 3 years ago, # |   +2 you have to solve a lot of Div2 C ,here is a list of Div2 C problems sorted by their difficult , try to solve as you can HERE. Do a lot of virtual contests starting from old contests which is easier , and try to solve problems you didn't solve after the contest by reading the tutorial . when you can't solve a problem after 30-60 minute , read the tutorial and solve the problem maybe there is a trick or algorithm you don't know ,if you found new algorithm or data structure you don't know in the tutorial search for it and solve about 10 problems related to it.
 » 3 years ago, # |   +22 Have you thought about possible psychological reasons? For example: Expectations: you assume you should be able to solve div2-C problems faster than you were 10 months before, but you don't. It's possible that a lot of your brainpower is wasted thinking on stuff like that while solving problems. Biases: you know the B-C gap exists, and you know your (low) success rate on these problems. So, it's possible that you are "treating" Div2-C problems with fear and with no so very inner hope. Evaluation anxiety: lot of people just sucks at doing exams and things under pressure. Also, maybe what you lack is mathematical training. I mean, your coding abilities are nice but you have no training on how to prove things, you don't know some math properties and fields that are supposed to be known in competitive programming (for example, basic combinatorics) and therefore you often don't grasp algorithmic concepts and ideas. Lot of competitive programming problems are esentially math in some way or another (even if they are not about number theory or something similar).
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 These are good points. Studies also show that participating in contest while answering questions of your colleagues affects your performance :)
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 are you doing contest while you're busy at work? doesn't sound like you can focus on solving in a situation like that
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 Contests at weekends became pretty rare, so I have no other options =)
•  » » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 you have virtual contests at Codeforces or https://a2oj.com/
•  » » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 Well, this is my case too. Contest are frequently at 12:30 PM EST time in the middle of my busy work day.
 » 3 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +4 Free advice is worth what you pay for it Don't focus on ratings. Do you enjoy it? Can you not imagine your life without it? Yes and yes? Keep going. Yes & no? Keep going. No and no? ...If you love solving problems, you'll push yourself harder. Once problems of certain difficulty become easy for you, you'll automatically want to read complex algorithms/data structures/maths because that's what you're here for. You're here to think hard and solve problems. But, you'll have to love the journey first. Destination is unfortunately, unknown. We don't quite know how much we'll improve, we're just enjoying our time here.
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +6 (Fame? Except for toutist, how many great coder you know?) What about Petr?
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +17 If you go to a gym and start randomly exercise without any system and knowledge how to use each training equipment correctly, then you get stuck after a few months. You get stuck especially if you eat random food without any idea which and how much carbs, fats, proteins you need.My point is that bare fun is not enough (but necessary of course). You do need system of training if you want to achieve high results. Not true. There are whole class of high paying jobs which offers extremely challenging and non-trivial tasks. To get this type of job you have to show outstanding problem solving skills. Examples: Jane Street, D. E. Shaw. Being red means that you can easily grasp hardcore math books (especially discrete math). May be you can solve unsolved problem one day? Who knows? CodeForces is an excellent platform to earn problem solving skills. Etc
 » 3 years ago, # |   +27 I have participated 198 rated contest in codeforces ( hardly missed any contest in last 4 years ) and solved more than 600+ problems here. Actually I solved 2000+ problems from different online judges ( Uva , Loj etc ) and its not a small amount. I used to able to solve Div2 A,B,C in January 2014 and my rating was around 1500 and still so , in short there is no improvement for me in last 2 and half years. Its hurting but its not true that i haven't improved and learned. I have made more mistakes in last 2 and half years. So i have learned a lot from them.Eventually we all are improving as long as we are thinking. There are three phase for every competitive programmer. when one read problem but have no idea how to solve it. when one have idea how it can be solved but no idea how to code it. when one know how to code and able to code it. what i believe in last two year i have improved from stage one to two and haven't reach in stage three yet. As i am working now i don't have that free time for practice that i used to have. As long as one don't give up and work towards his goal success will come sooner or later. So keep going and don't think too much about why you aren't improving. Fact is you are improving. Solving is improving , participating is improving. All the best :)
 » 3 years ago, # |   0 I don't believe in going so beyond of current skills ! Small successes can help people to keep on their way for big success. ( just my experience )I hope helps : http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/46021?#comment-305566
 » 3 years ago, # |   +17 hi, i also have a question if someone minds helping me. i usually spend a lot of time thinking on a problem.while training, as long as new ideas come to my mind i still try to solve a problem my own. and before giving up i set something like an hour before searching the solution (as a final resort for some magical idea to come to my head).for instance, i spent something like two days and a half on problem 709E - Centroids. luckily, i managed to solve it. however, the question is: is it a good practise to spend a lot of time on a single problem or is it better to strict a fixed amount of time for a problem? i basically do this because aside from CF finding a solution is hard and understanding a solution is harder. even CF editorials a lot of them are not that clear. besides that, after seeing the solution you can't tell the intuition behind it.thanks for any help :)
•  » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   +3 Do you mind helping me?I still can't get AC on that problem(Centroids). Can you tell me how it can be solved with LCA? I'm confused because the test case I'm failing on is huge. You can refer to this to know my idea with LCA and link to code. I'll really appreciate your help.
•  » » » 3 years ago, # ^ |   0 it's my pleasure to try helping you :)
 » 17 months ago, # |   0 @omgcoinDid you quit CP? Or CF? Or did you not follow the advice of the comments? Because sadly there seems to be no improvment in your rating.Please dont mind but I am asking because I too am an ungifted CP enthusiast doing CP with a poor math background only for a better job.Is duckladydinh comment true? Are some people cursed for mediocrity?
 » 17 months ago, # |   0 You can also read this post: https://www.quora.com/How-did-Anudeep-Nekkanti-become-so-good-at-competitive-programming