Educational Codeforces Round 24
By BledDest, history, 7 years ago, In English

Hello Codeforces!

On June 29, 18:05 MSK Educational Codeforces Round 24 will start.

Series of Educational Rounds continue being held as Harbour.Space University initiative! You can read the details about the cooperation between Harbour.Space University and Codeforces in the blog post.

The round will be unrated for all users and will be held on extented ACM ICPC rules. After the end of the contest you will have one day to hack any solution you want. You will have access to copy any solution and test it locally.

You will be given 7 problems and 2 hours 15 minutes to solve them.

The problems were prepared by Mikhail awoo Piklyaev, Alexey Perforator Ripinen and me.

Good luck to all participants!

I also have a message from Harbour.Space University about the ML course held at the university:

Nowadays machine learning technologies are widely used in practice in various applied fields such as retail, mass media, PR and marketing, banking, telecommunications, manufacturing, science and many other areas.

We are pleased to announce our Industrial Machine Learning course, aimed to teach the structure and the life cycle of the machine learning process and covers topics ranging from the problem statement to final quality assessment as well as estimation of the economic effect.

This course is taught by two Data Scientists from Yandex, Emeli Dral and Victor Kantor. Emeli Dral is the Head of Predictive Analysis, whereas Victor Kantor is the Head of User Behaviour Analysis Group at Yandex.

http://in.harbour.space/data-science/industrial-machine-learning/

They share with us their knowledge on everything from the most promising applications of data science today to applying the latest advancements in machine learning to your work.

UPD: The editorial can be found here.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +177
  • Vote: I do not like it

Comments Comments (76)
| Write comment?
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +48 Vote: I do not like it

Okay, CF on a hat-trick.

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -45 Vote: I do not like it

Is it not rated!

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +135 Vote: I do not like it

If they find a bug in the jury's solution does it mean that the contest becomes rated?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

I would honestly not be surprised if at the end of this round they say it's rated.

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +75 Vote: I do not like it

I love educational rounds because they are announced unrated prior to the contest.

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +107 Vote: I do not like it

BledDest's Educational Round from 18 to 23 are awesome. I learned something new on every round. Congratulation for your contribution to consecutive 7 Rounds in a row .

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -37 Vote: I do not like it

Less Enthusiasm to finish all 7 problems since it is unrated :|

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Read Statements of Problem 1,2 and 4. Most Unclear Problem Statements and Test Case Explanation.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Indeed.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +19 Vote: I do not like it

      Exactly. In first question, first of all they should mention that students who get diplomas cannot get certificates and vice versa. Also it should be diplomas OR certificates instead of AND. 2nd and 4th are even more unclear than the first

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

    Idk, for me it seems totally fine.

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

Why am i getting TLE on 7th testcase on D. I think time complexity of this code is O(nlogn)

code:
→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Your Code complexity is not nlogn.

    I implemented the same idea as yours but efficiently without the while loop, you can view my solution here : 28150986

    UPD : The explanation is wrong, the cause of TLE is something else. See this

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      well i think this soln is similar to mine and got AC 28144801

      → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      The while loop will erase elements atmost n times, coz i am always erasing previously inserted elements, so the time complexity is nlongn for insertion + nlogn for erasing n elements! Total time complexity: nlogn

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        7 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        I am really sorry.

        You are right your code complexity is nlogn.

        I think what you are missing is to reinitialise flag = 0. Once your flag is set to it never becomes 0 again causing the while loop to run in every loop after that, hence causing TLE.

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Actually, i don't think reinitialise of flag is required. Once flag is is set while should run for every iteration. The point is while will never run more than n times, so won't cause any problem, even there is no need of flag in while's condition. 28156733 (submission without flag in while's condition) .

          → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Actually flag is not causing the TLE, the problem is after erasing the color, whe should update its hash in h[] array, coz it can't be part of ans anymore.

          AC code: 28157043

          → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

WTF, I got AC in C and D, but didn't manage to do it in B...

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    How to solve B? :/

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

      a[l[i]]=(l[i + 1] — l[i] + n) % n; check if everything is ok.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        7 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Yeah, i did the same

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          So i think there's a bug in my solution

          → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          What if a[i] contains two values?

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            7 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            For example l[]={3, 5, 3, 6}

            → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          maybe the final permutation contains a 0???..that happened to me

          → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Thanks, just got AC

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    a[l[i]] should be the distance between l[i] and l[i + 1], and a should form permutation.

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve D?

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    For every color contain if it can be B and its current cnt. When increasing cnt sompare it with cnt[A].

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
      ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      I guess complexity will be O(n2) then.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        7 years ago, # ^ |
        ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        ignore.

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Am I right, then?

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            7 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            I just realised that my solution is different.

            → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        7 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        I mean considering that I have an array of say 10 elements and out of them 5 have value equal to A.

        The other 5 are different (unique) elements.

        So I will have to keep on comparing them with A`s indexes.

        This will become * =

        Am I correct?

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          7 years ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          Yes, if for each B, you iterate through the whole array.

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            7 years ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            So, is there any way to do in O(nlog(n))

            → Reply
            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              7 years ago, # ^ |
                Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              Yes, put the counts of all the possible Bs in priority queue and keep invalidating them as soon as possible. See my code.

              → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        7 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Here's my code: It's O(n + #colors).

        → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve E?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

E is kind a to easy for E,rather level of Div 1 B.It's just two pointer,and you could easlly hash with prime factors of numbers because number of prime factors of n is ,so baisicly I did nothing smart for this accepted,unlike some other E's where there is some beautiful observation.My 28153516

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Can D be done by 2 pointer? I couldn't implement it.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    What is you 2 pointer approach? I tried it solving by always keeping set of possible answer for all positions, if at any position set is empty, print -1.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      7 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      For every color available store their indices and then compare them with indices of Alice's car find who will win how many times and if Alice's car looses then Bob can win by choosing that color.

      → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    I tried solving E using 2-pointers but was getting TLE on 16.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

    D can be done in O(N).
    Code-28146537

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

Here is the Problem E on Hackerearth created by MazzForces .

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -10 Vote: I do not like it

    .

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +9 Vote: I do not like it

    This problem's name is a very, very big irony.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +22 Vote: I do not like it

    Oh, wow, I guess we were not that creative. Sorry, none of authors and testers heard about this one and we weren't able to google anything.

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I got WA at test 4 in both B and D I tried all possible test cases especially in D and I did't figure out what is wrong with my code ?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve C? I used Cumulative sum trick for each direction.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    That's exactly what I did too. Plus you also need to consider that the same sofa would also be counted in two directions. For example, in cumulative sum,for say a sofa with coordinates 1 1 1 2 , the cumulative sum in up and down direction will also account for the same sofa you are querying for, but not in the left or right direction.

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Good round but I couldn't solve problem C...any help??Thanks in advance

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    C is just careful case-work if I'm not wrong.Use four arrays to store for every sofa its min x in 1st,max x in 2nd,min y in 3rd and max y in 4th.Sort all of them using counting sort,i.e you could count number of those whose value is z.Now use prefix sum,i.e count how many sofa s are there with min x less then some value r for every r<n.Now for every sofa use opposite value to count number of sofas in each direction,when we want to know number of sofas on left for sofa i,we use max x_{i} and yust use prefix sum we calculated.That's O(n).

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +12 Vote: I do not like it

Problem E was very nice, can be done with simple algorithms. Thanks for such problems :)

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it -14 Vote: I do not like it

problem A can be solvable using binary search . Equation is k*x+x<=n/2. Now search on x. Here x is number of diplomas. Here is my AC code : http://codeforces.com/contest/818/submission/28144078

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hack for A?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +15 Vote: I do not like it

When you find a hack in your solution!

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +65 Vote: I do not like it

When you think you've used the same (maybe sub-optimal) algorithm as everyone, but the only solution you're able to hack is your own. :(

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Is really F so easy ?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can someone tell what is wrong in 28167345

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Integer overflow. You are storing values in long data types but they can exceed the maximum permissible limit.

    eg. If you have an array of length 100 in which all elements are 2, s[99] will supposedly store 2^100 which will overflow.

    → Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can I get All links to Educational Round?

→ Reply
»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I got judgement failed in problem G constantly.

How to solve it(?

Here is my submission -> 28719413

→ Reply