**tutorial**

**tutorial**

**tutorial**

**tutorial**

**tutorial**

**tutorial**

**tutorial**

# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|

1 | tourist | 3557 |

2 | Radewoosh | 3468 |

3 | Um_nik | 3429 |

4 | Petr | 3354 |

5 | Benq | 3286 |

6 | mnbvmar | 3280 |

7 | LHiC | 3276 |

8 | wxhtxdy | 3258 |

9 | ecnerwala | 3214 |

10 | yutaka1999 | 3190 |

# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|

1 | Errichto | 191 |

2 | Radewoosh | 180 |

3 | tourist | 173 |

4 | antontrygubO_o | 165 |

4 | Vovuh | 165 |

6 | PikMike | 164 |

7 | rng_58 | 160 |

8 | majk | 156 |

9 | Um_nik | 155 |

10 | 300iq | 154 |

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

Tutorial is loading...

↑

↓

Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2019 Mike Mirzayanov

The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform

Server time: Oct/21/2019 04:25:55 (h3).

Desktop version, switch to mobile version.

Supported by

User lists

Name |
---|

Auto comment: topic has been updated by neckbosov (previous revision, new revision, compare).Can't access codes. Thanks for the editorial though !

Your code(38299456) for problem Div2. C / Div1. A is not accessible. Please fix it.

Update: Actually none of the codes in the editorial is accessible.

The codes are accessible. Click on the "tutorial" link to reveal a "solution" link towards the end.

They were not accessible at the time of our comments :)

Can you prove that your optimization in A improves complexity? Or have you just put there some random opt and noticed that it significantly sped up on tests you prepared? The way it is put right now is for me kinda unserious.

Look here for relevant discussion: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/59457?#comment-431043

Authors should use the "you must use some optimizations to make it pass" only if necessary, so I guess only if there is some naive solution that would pass with bigger TL. Otherwise, you just make a problem worse (less cool).

Here you go. http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/59457?#comment-431152

Can anyone explain div2 C more clearly?

I think problem div 2 C the whole round and i can't figured it out till i read the tutorial and know that a problem is finite only if exist k that q | p*b^k. But how do we figure out this fact?If you know this fact,then the problem will be easily solved.

Sorry for poor English.

Try dividing a smaller number with a larger one in some base b . You will find that at each step of division we will be doing r=(r*b)%q . After some point of time if r=0 then we are done .In simple words if (p*b^k)%q=0 for some k then fraction will be finite .

p, q, and b have range 1E18. How would we be multiplying p*b^k? Won't it overflow?

use binary multiplication

I got it!! :D

My thought process for base 10:

Let's assume our fraction is . If

q's prime factors are 2 and 5, we can always multiply it by 2 and 5 until it becomes a power of 10, i.e.q2^{a}5^{b}= 10^{n}. Let's assumeqhas some other prime factor, e.g. 3. Then, there must exist such thatq2^{a}5^{b}= 10^{n}, which is obviously impossible, since the right-hand side must be divisible by 3 too. It is easy to generalize this to a base with arbitrary prime factors.For Div 1.C, the state can be defined as: the number of employees that have already entered to the elevator (

m), the destinations of the employees that are currently in the elevator (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}) (x_{i}may be zero, which means the corresponding position is empty), and the floor where the elevator currently is (f). However, there are 2000 × 10^{4}× 9 ≈ 2e8 different states; to reduce the number of states, we may ''canonicalize'' destinations of the employees that are currently in the elevator, by sortingx_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}to make sure that they are in ascending order. Now the number of states is only about 1e7, which is small enough. Now we can directly perform BFS with memoization. For each state (m,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4},f), we canf< 9;f> 1;x_{i}=f;x_{1}= 0 &&m<n&&a_{m + 1}=f;Each of these operations takes exactly one second, so we do not need Dijkstra or other shortest path algorithm; BFS works here. Note that, we ''violate the atomicity'' of the second command described in the problem; however, it is not hard to prove that such violation won't imporove the final answer.

am i the only one solved div 1 C using BFS?

I used it, too.

I didn't understand Div. 2 D / Div. 1 B. After reading the problem, I thought that the function given just finds the XOR of all elements present in the input sequence and given l and r, we need to find the maximum value of XOR from all continuous sub-sequences. But, I got stuck in sample test case 2 (query 1).

Here the interval is [1, 6]. Shouldn't the maximum value of the function be

`63`

(XOR of all elements A[1]-A[6]) instead pf`60`

? I didn't understand the Editorial solution. Please tell me if I am making any mistakes in understanding the problem statement!f(1,2,4,8,16,32) -> f(1^2,2^4,4^8,8^16,16^32) = f(3,6,12,24,48) -> f(3^6,6^12,12^24,24^48) = f(5,10,20,40) -> f(5^10,10^20,20^40) = f(15,30,60) -> f(15^30,30^60) = f(17,34) -> f(17^34) = f(51) = 51

Oh no! I understand now. This problem is not that simple as it looks. I made a terrible misunderstanding! :-(

In div2 B in some test cases input says 100 n and 100 m but the input given was 5 n and varying m . My code is giving wrong answers on those types of cases. Please look upon it.

detailed explaination about div2 C. my proof to div 2.C(div 1. A)

UPD:Thanks to`I_LOVE_SMRITI_KIRAN`

and`thanglong`

, they find some unclear sentences and welcome you to give me more so that i can do it better. Here is what i rewrite.Thanks buddy

Can you explain the solution for this testcase when p=7 q=5 base = 7 ?. p in base b can be written as 10 and 5 can be written as 5. so p/q= 10/5 and the answer becomes FINITE. But the actual answer is INFINITE .. Any help where am i going wrong?

init: p=7,q=5,base=7;

My explaination use "1/p" to explain how to judge not using "1/q", which maybe puzzle you, i should apologize for that if so.

Got it .. Thanks a lot . Mate :)

Does (p,q)=1 matter?

Why did you have to make p,q relatively prime?

e.g. p=3, q=30, base=10, now 3/30 is just 1/10=0.01, is

`finite`

, however if you do not do reduction of a fraction，you will got the wrong answer`infinite`

.@zhsq11 You have a very beautiful handwriting. ^_^

Thank you for your praise. ^_^ It is the first time that a native English speaker praises my handwriting. :)

One last question,can you prove that p*base^n>q?,thanks.

emm...i don't think it is must to make p*base^n>q.

For a fraction

`p/q`

, if we prove`1/q`

is finite, then`p/q`

must be finite. so after reduction of the fraction, it will be not relevant with the numerator`p`

.Yeah! I really liked it :) but English is my 2 language :P

Also can you please help me debug my solution to problem C (Div 2) ?

Code link

I don't understand the meaning of the following code.

In fact, it's not a must to judge which one is bigger in b and c in your code. what we need to do is only to find whether b has a factor that c doesn't have.

here is my submission

Actually, I am saving b's value inside a temporary variable 'temp' and then dividing it with base c till I can. Then I check whether temp can be reduced to contain only the factors with base. I understand temp ==0 part and the comparison is unnecessary.

I got the mistake.

This is the case where my code would break:

1 1 54 9

Finally AC after 13 submissions and 5 hours.

also in the last paragraph, I think you mean "(base)^n can be divided by q". Nice proof btw...

Thank you

Thank you :D

For div 2 C, after dividing q by gcd(p,q), I calculate (b^(10e18))%q. The answer is finite if the result is 0 else infinite. Since q<10e18, the exponent of any of its prime factor is less than 64. So b^(10e18) should always be divisible by q if all prime factors of q are factors of b as well. Can anyone explain why this gives a wrong answer on test case 11?

Code: http://codeforces.com/contest/984/submission/38308682

Overflow in exponentiation function at line x = (x * x) % MOD .

Since x can be as large as 10

^{18}. A prerequisite for the exponentiation is that the square must not overflow.Your argument however seems correct.

I didn't like the way the last paragraph of 1E was written (took quite a bit to figure out), so for anyone who might be struggling to understand it, I hope this helps:

We have reduced the question to the following cleaner problem:

Given some paths in a tree, determine if there is a subpath between s_i and t_i. (2e5 queries on the same set of paths). If one is an ancestor of the other, we can possibly handle it together with the earlier binary lifting. Otherwise, this is equivalent to asking if there exists a path with endpoints in the subtrees of s_i and t_i.

Using the Euler's Tour technique, a subtree gets transformed into a range. So now each path can be represented by a start and an end point, and we want to know if there is some path which starts in the range corresponding to the subtree of s_i and ends in the range corresponding to the subtree of t_i (wlog assume s_i comes before t_i in the tour).

If we represent a path as a pair (a, b) -- the start and end points, we realise that this is an

offline 2D range query. We now solve the black-boxed problem.If we had a good bookcode for 2D segment tree we were confident in, we could stop here now, but we can do better since it is offline:

We will be using a 1D fenwick tree to count the number of points with x-coordinates in a certain range. Furthermore, for a rectangle, we will be making 2 queries: the number of points under the top of the rectangle and the number of points under the bottom of the rectangle (and we can then subtract).

We process points and queries simultaneously in increasing y-coordinate. Hence, when a query is processed, the fenwick tree on the x-coordinate reflects all points under the current y-coordinate which gives us what we require.

Thanks for writing up a much better explanation!

I couldn't understand the last paragraph of the tutorial solution to 1E at all, even after rereading it dozens of times.

Did anyone do recursive dp solution for Div2 D / Div1B ?

Sure (not in contest though)

"It's neccesary to do some optimizations to pass TL."

For Div1 A, I couldn't come up with the iterative reducing technique of Q until it reaches 1. Nice technique, by the way. To my surprise, java BigInteger worked within TL.

BigInteger Solution

Can anybody explain me please at div1 B, why f( l , r ) = f( l , r-1 ) ^ f( l+1 , r) ?

Look at the "pyramid" for f(1, 2, 4, 8), the arrows represent XOR. (Sorry for the poor drawing):

And the pyramid for f(1, 2, 4). Can you find it in f(1, 2, 4, 8)?

This is the basic idea. I think you can prove it by induction on N := number of parameters in f.

For N = 2, it is obviously true, and then...

Thanks, it helped me a lot

Thank you so much for this.

Div1C. Any relation with editorial and solution code? The definition of 'state' is different at least i think. The solution code is just representing the state in base of 10.

Can anybody point me to the proof of the maths applied in Div2 C problem

here

How to observe "dp[i][j] = dp[i — 1][j + 1] ^ dp[i — 1][j" in Div2 D or Div1 ?

draw it!!

or by experience ( and guessing XDD

Can someone give detailed explanation of Div 2 D. How the array dp[n][n] is formed?

In div1B , f(l,r) seems to be f(l,r-1) ^ f(l+1,r) , any intuitive or easy proof of this?

Induction.

`f(a(l),..,a(r)) = f(a(l)^a(l+1),.....,a(r-1)^a(r)) =`

`f(a(l)^a(l+1),....,a(r-2)^a(r-1)) ^ f(a(l+1)^a(l+2),.....,a(r-1)^a(r))`

(induction step on smaller length)=`f(a(l),...,a(r-1)) ^ f(a(l+1),....,a(r))`

.can you please explain in more detail

please see this link

this 1

this 2

this

codeforces.com/contest/984/submission/38316222

and still you have question you can ask!

How do u guarantee that a[i+1][j] is already calculated when u calculate a[i][j] in step 2?

First equality is coming from the definition of

`f`

.Second equality is coming from the induction. (Assuming that our assumption holds for smaller arrays. As a base step of the induction, length of the array is 2.)

Third equality is coming from the definition of

`f`

.Actually, after knowing the answer it seems trivial. But initially, how you came up with such recurrence? Is it standard, or just by observation?

My code for div2C (div1A) is failing on the 7 case. Can someone please help me debug it?

Thanks in advance.

Code link

line 31 else if (b>c)

you didn't handle the case b<c

like b=20 and c=25

that is finite

can anybody please clarify the statement written for 483(div 2)D ..... i m really confused....

good problems in this problemset.

Sorry, I am a newbie and I am confused in the mathematical notation | in (q ∣ p⋅b^k). Can anyone please explain?

a|b means b is divisible by a.

Anyone solved D with dp + segment tree? I observed how to calculate f values, but to calculate max value in range I used segment tree.

Did your solution work? DP array takes 5000x5000 memory which is okay, but segment tree on 2-D array takes 16x5000x5000 space which is too much. Even if we get the memory, build_tree would time out for such a huge tree.

Its not 2d segment tree. You can see solution. I insert dp values in specific order in 1d array and then 1d segment tree on that array.

Thank you for the contest. However, I think the time limit for problem C div 2 is too tight. I tried your solution without fast input/output. It still got TLE. Here is my submission: http://codeforces.com/contest/983/submission/38354529.

I think it would be better if you consider to extend the time limit a little bit more next time.

Taking into consideration when fast input is needed is part of solving problems, it's the same as considering when long long is needed or not.

I agree the TL was a bit tight but the setters did it intentionally. At least they didn't hide it and put the worst case for the "naive" algorithm in pretests.

I think If needed it should be mentioned in problem statement. Or if the time limit difference is so crucial then I think there probably be another type of input like randomly generating input based on a fomular. But yea, I will consider fast input in my solution next time. Thank you.

...

For Div 2 E, could someone explain how state is stored? I want to use an integer, so that the ith digit (i from 1 to 4) is the floor that the ith person wants to go. The 5th digit is the current floor the elevator is on. But there must be a better way.

Also,

"The fast one is we say we go from the floor a[i] to the floor a[i + 1] and iterate over the persons who we let come in on the way."What does this mean?What is the state of dp in DIV.2 D? Thanks in advance :-)

The left index and the right index of your segment

For the div1 D, how can I figure out this fantastic segment tree. it's to difficult for me to choose the three features to describe this problem... Please help me understand this algorithm further.. THX!

used priority queue but not working properly please help https://ideone.com/JE16M9

HELP HELP HELP !!! In div2 C/div1 A If i use " ios::sync_with_stdio(false); cin.tie(nullptr); cout.tie(nullptr); " then it is not showing TLE else it is showing TLE on testcase 11 ? can someone explain why ?

And tell me how can i know where to use this and where not to use this ?