№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
2 | Benq | 3581 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | Geothermal | 3569 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3531 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
9 | Um_nik | 3482 |
10 | jiangly | 3468 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Название |
---|
std::map sorts key values, so while iterating them you go from less to bigger and that's what you need for this problem. However, unordered_map does not sort them and it leads to WA.
TooNewbie but why we need order to be sorted . why we need to iterate from lesser to higher . ?
You need to minimize the value of mp[1] since the possibility of traveling to that point is enough to visit all positions. While considering the values from lower to higher and if you had 1 in your map, it will appear earlier, consequently, you will find more optimal choices for mp[1].
okay , i understand . basically u r saying , for a particular mp[gcd] value , we have to check all pair , if we use un.map then some values may skip which will reduce our optimallity .
for the help.