Hey! I have a question. If I have to calculate a pow b modulo mod, with b>mod, is it the same with a pow (b % (mod-1)?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
2 | Benq | 3581 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | Geothermal | 3569 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3531 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
9 | Um_nik | 3482 |
10 | jiangly | 3468 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 162 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Hey! I have a question. If I have to calculate a pow b modulo mod, with b>mod, is it the same with a pow (b % (mod-1)?
Название |
---|
By Euler's Theorem, if gcd(a, n) = 1, . If m happens to be a prime, then phi(m) = m - 1.
If "gcd(a,n)=1", you mean gcd(a,m)=1? I can not see the n
Upps, sorry. You're right, that was meant to be an m :)
Thanks!
Even when gcd(a, n) > 1, the following holds: If b ≥ φ(m), . When m is large and you cannot efficiently factor it to compute φ(m) and b is given in decimal form, you can still use fast exponentiation. Process digits of b one by one starting from the most significant one and use a10b + c = (ab)10 × ac.