Блог пользователя gop2024

Автор gop2024, история, 5 лет назад, перевод, По-русски

(Идея задачи A — ----------)

Tutorial is loading...

Код

(Идея задачи B — IbragiMMamilov)

Tutorial is loading...

Код

(Идея задачи C — usertab34)

Tutorial is loading...

Код

(Идея задачи D — Denisson)

Tutorial is loading...

Код

(Идея задачи E — Ralsei)

Tutorial is loading...

Код

Разбор задач Codeforces Round 546 (Div. 2)
  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +61
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by gop2024 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +12 Проголосовать: не нравится

The code links are bringing me back to this blog, please fix them :D

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

code link break

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

finally the editorial!

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

Such a great second solution for D.

»
5 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

Why I am getting you're not allowed to view the requested page when I click on code of all question.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

the links get back to this page??why is it so??

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can someone share some intuitions for how to come up with a solution for problem E ? Implementing the editorial's solution is relatively simple but coming up with such a solution from scratch is not as simple.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can anybody explain me how to do DFS on a complemented graph fast enough. I don't understand the explonation for the problem D. The realization that i can see takes $$$O(n k log m)$$$ time where k is amount reachable vertices.

For example, n = 5 and 4 is reachable frome 5, 3 — from 5, 1 — from 3 and 2 — from 3. the algorithm start at 5. it looks through (1, 2, 3, 4), sees that 4 is reachable and goes to 4. it looks throuth (1, 2, 3) and doesn't see reachable and goes back to 5 and looks through (1, 2, 3), sees that 3 is reachable and goes to 3, looks through (1, 2) and sees that 2 is reachable and goes to 2, looks throuth (1), sees that 1 is unreachable, goes back to 3, looks through (1), 1 is reachable, goes to 1, looks through (), goes back to 3, then goes back to 5. End.

In this way I have undertood the explanation. Then let's cosider a graph with n vertex wich has only edges from n to each node of set {n — k + 1, ..., n — 1}. For such graph the steps which described above takes O(n k log(m)) time.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

could you anyone give me example code of C please?? i can't understand the meaning of editorial.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +10 Проголосовать: не нравится

Best codeforces explanation I've ever seen. Thanks!

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can some one explain me how the complexity for first solution of problem D is O(n+m). Won't it be n^2 in worst case if set P keeps on increasing.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can someone explain D's solutions with an example ?

  • »
    »
    5 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    So we start from end of the queue, i.e., from Nastya. Now if person next to Nastya will let her move to front, then we will swap them. But if he doesn't then we'll add him to a set P. This set P signifies the set of all people that need to be swapped with a new person we encounter so that Nastya can move a step forward in the queue (as Nastya can move a step forward only if all the persons ahead of her, that can't be swapped with her, move a step forward). Note: Nastya was added initially to set P, as she always needs to be swapped to move a step forward.

    I will give an example if still needed.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

can someone please explain C , i did not understood the editorial

  • »
    »
    5 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Just remember one thing. After taking any number of transposes the value of (i + j) doesn't change. Here (i, j) is the position of any cell in the matrix. So just store the count of every element for every (i + j) for both the given matrices and compare both. Here is my submission

    • »
      »
      »
      5 лет назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Why the value of (i+j) doesn't change.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 лет назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Suppose you are taking the transpose of a square submatrix whose upper left corner is (a, b). consider a point (i, j) who fall under the submatrix. Its coordinates w.r.t. to (a, b) would be (i — a, j — b). After talking transpose it would become (j — b, i — a). Now again the real coordinates of this point would be (j — b + a, i — a + b). So you can see initially the coordinates were (i, j) for which sum of coordinates was i + j. In the later case it is also i + j.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Anyone explain me 1136C — Nastya Is Transposing Matrices, in more detail.

  • »
    »
    5 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    You have two types of diagonals, ones with i+j constant(top right to bottom left) and ones with i-j constant(top left to bottom right). When you take any square sub matrix and apply transpose, you find that elements on the 2nd type of diagonal change positions. But they remain on the same diagonal. In other words, [0][0] can't change it's place. [1][0] and [0][1] can swap places among themselves but not with any other element. We can also obtain any permutation of an (i+j) diagonal by starting with the top left corner and progressively fixing elements in the next diagonal by picking matrix of size 2x2 and swapping elements which aren't on the main diagonal of it. So we only need to check if the corresponding multisets of diagonal (i+j) are same.

»
5 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can anyone give explanation of solution 1 of problem D?Whats the idea?

»
5 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I wrote a recursive solution for D. I think the overall complexity of my approach is )(n+m) but I am getting Time Limit Exceeded. https://codeforces.com/contest/1136/submission/52883893

My recursive function on a given position tries to move the pupil at that position ahead in the queue by one place by either:- 1. trying to swap with the person in right in front. 2. trying to get the person right in front to move ahead so that another pupil comes right in front and then try the same thing with the new pupil.

Can someone help me why it's getting TLE? Thanks.

»
3 года назад, # |
Rev. 7   Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

My solution to Problem E — Nastya Hasn't Written a Legend supports modifications of k (assuming each modification makes things still stay valid or there's another conditional update that makes things stay valid) and this solution is completely different than the editorial's solution. Furthermore, the complexity of my solution is $$$O(n\log(n))$$$

My Solution: