Here is the link to the editorial. Feel free to discuss problems and ask me questions. I'll be glad to improve the editorial with your comments.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
2 | Benq | 3580 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
10 | jiangly | 3467 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Name |
---|
I'm not getting div2 c ...how it is linked to knapsack?? can you explain the logic more clearly??
We want to find the probability of gaining i scores in games other than G. It's similar to finding in how many ways we gain i scores. It's a knapsack problem.
we need to gain i scores in such a way that after adding G to it .It must become greater than n*(n+1)/4.In other words we need to look for only those i's such that after adding G to it ,it can become greater than n*(n+1)/4.Am i right?
and we'll use knapsack to find those i's and we won't be using G as a weight?
Correct.
Thank you :)