f(l, r) = max(al,al+1...ar), g(l, r) = min(al, al+1...ar)
How can i calc ∑∑f(l,r) * g(l,r) mod 1e9 + 7?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3640 |
2 | Benq | 3593 |
3 | tourist | 3572 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
f(l, r) = max(al,al+1...ar), g(l, r) = min(al, al+1...ar)
How can i calc ∑∑f(l,r) * g(l,r) mod 1e9 + 7?
Название |
---|
Use a stack to find the l & r for each 'i' such that l <= i <= r and f(l, r) = a[i], and store these in an array 'big'. Do the same thing for each 'i' such that g(l, r) = a[i], and store these in an array 'small'. Both of these tasks can be done in O(N).
Let's try to find ∑ g(l, r). This can be done in O(N) by iterating through small and finding the sum of ∑ (a[i] * (small[i].r — small[i].l + 1)). It should be easy to understand why this is the case. Let's call this sum 'sum_g'.
Our answer turns out to be ∑ (a[i] * sum_g * (large[i].r — large[i].l + 1)). Of course, you should be careful with mods when calculating each quantity.