# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3640 |
2 | Benq | 3593 |
3 | tourist | 3572 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
0
Thanks a million for your instant help ;) |
+4
Hello Codeforces, I got the below message from the system after yesterday's Educational Codeforces Round 72. Attention! Your solution 60112264 for the problem 1217F significantly coincides with solutions YangDavid/60108293, Return.Hao/60112264. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked. In this contest, I use the template from https://loj.ac/submission/27031, to solve the problem F. As it's submission time(2017-10-07) is notably earlier than the contest time(2019-09-06), I firmly believe it can be a conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition. Therefore, I appeal to valid my solutions for Educational Codeforces Round 72. Thanks. |
Name |
---|