Virtual contest is a way to take part in past contest, as close as possible to participation on time. It is supported only ICPC mode for virtual contests.
If you've seen these problems, a virtual contest is not for you - solve these problems in the archive.
If you just want to solve some problem from a contest, a virtual contest is not for you - solve this problem in the archive.
Never use someone else's code, read the tutorials or communicate with other person during a virtual contest.

No tag edit access

E. Stack Sorting

time limit per test

2 secondsmemory limit per test

256 megabytesinput

standard inputoutput

standard outputLet's suppose you have an array *a*, a stack *s* (initially empty) and an array *b* (also initially empty).

You may perform the following operations until both *a* and *s* are empty:

- Take the first element of
*a*, push it into*s*and remove it from*a*(if*a*is not empty); - Take the top element from
*s*, append it to the end of array*b*and remove it from*s*(if*s*is not empty).

You can perform these operations in arbitrary order.

If there exists a way to perform the operations such that array *b* is sorted in non-descending order in the end, then array *a* is called stack-sortable.

For example, [3, 1, 2] is stack-sortable, because *b* will be sorted if we perform the following operations:

- Remove 3 from
*a*and push it into*s*; - Remove 1 from
*a*and push it into*s*; - Remove 1 from
*s*and append it to the end of*b*; - Remove 2 from
*a*and push it into*s*; - Remove 2 from
*s*and append it to the end of*b*; - Remove 3 from
*s*and append it to the end of*b*.

After all these operations *b* = [1, 2, 3], so [3, 1, 2] is stack-sortable. [2, 3, 1] is not stack-sortable.

You are given *k* first elements of some permutation *p* of size *n* (recall that a permutation of size *n* is an array of size *n* where each integer from 1 to *n* occurs exactly once). You have to restore the remaining *n* - *k* elements of this permutation so it is stack-sortable. If there are multiple answers, choose the answer such that *p* is lexicographically maximal (an array *q* is lexicographically greater than an array *p* iff there exists some integer *k* such that for every *i* < *k* *q*_{i} = *p*_{i}, and *q*_{k} > *p*_{k}). You may not swap or change any of first *k* elements of the permutation.

Print the lexicographically maximal permutation *p* you can obtain.

If there exists no answer then output -1.

Input

The first line contains two integers *n* and *k* (2 ≤ *n* ≤ 200000, 1 ≤ *k* < *n*) — the size of a desired permutation, and the number of elements you are given, respectively.

The second line contains *k* integers *p*_{1}, *p*_{2}, ..., *p*_{k} (1 ≤ *p*_{i} ≤ *n*) — the first *k* elements of *p*. These integers are pairwise distinct.

Output

If it is possible to restore a stack-sortable permutation *p* of size *n* such that the first *k* elements of *p* are equal to elements given in the input, print lexicographically maximal such permutation.

Otherwise print -1.

Examples

Input

5 3

3 2 1

Output

3 2 1 5 4

Input

5 3

2 3 1

Output

-1

Input

5 1

3

Output

3 2 1 5 4

Input

5 2

3 4

Output

-1

Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2019 Mike Mirzayanov

The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform

Server time: Oct/17/2019 22:46:20 (e1).

Desktop version, switch to mobile version.

Supported by

User lists

Name |
---|