in this problem. the third test case says that node 2 and node 1 have cats so the path from 1 to 2 has 2 cats which is equal to m . but the jury answer is that there is no path with <= m cats . can anyone help me understand this test case ?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
2 | Benq | 3580 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
10 | jiangly | 3467 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
4 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
A Graph Problem
in this problem. the third test case says that node 2 and node 1 have cats so the path from 1 to 2 has 2 cats which is equal to m . but the jury answer is that there is no path with <= m cats . can anyone help me understand this test case ?
Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en2 | ShowStopper728 | 2017-12-19 11:31:06 | 11 | Tiny change: ' which is less than m .\nbut ' -> ' which is equal to m .\nbut ' | ||
en1 | ShowStopper728 | 2017-12-19 11:28:53 | 305 | Initial revision (published) |
Name |
---|