| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
| 2 | Benq | 3580 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
| 6 | tourist | 3565 |
| 7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
| 10 | jiangly | 3467 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | adamant | 164 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 159 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
| 7 | SecondThread | 150 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
A difficult problem
Recently I have encountered a difficult problem.
Given a matrix with size n * m (1 <= n, m <= 1500) consist of only 0 and 1, count the number of submatrix contains exactly k 1's. (0 <= k <= 6).
Could you help me to find an approach for this problem? Thanks
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
EternalFire | 2018-08-19 11:29:43 | 7 | Tiny change: 's problem?' -> 's problem? Thanks' | |
| en1 |
|
EternalFire | 2018-08-19 11:28:10 | 274 | Initial revision (published) |
