Hi everybody,

It's been exactly a year since MemSQL Start[c]UP 2.0 — Round 2, but I still have not received my T-shirt. Am I the only one with this problem?

Before contest

Codeforces Round #687 (Div. 1, based on Technocup 2021 Elimination Round 2)

37:48:09

Register now »

Codeforces Round #687 (Div. 1, based on Technocup 2021 Elimination Round 2)

37:48:09

Register now »

*has extra registration

Before contest

Codeforces Round #687 (Div. 2, based on Technocup 2021 Elimination Round 2)

37:48:09

Register now »

Codeforces Round #687 (Div. 2, based on Technocup 2021 Elimination Round 2)

37:48:09

Register now »

*has extra registration

# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|

1 | tourist | 3687 |

2 | ecnerwala | 3600 |

3 | Benq | 3503 |

4 | ksun48 | 3421 |

5 | Um_nik | 3412 |

6 | Radewoosh | 3382 |

7 | maroonrk | 3323 |

8 | Itst | 3239 |

9 | apiadu | 3238 |

10 | ko_osaga | 3232 |

# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|

1 | Errichto | 205 |

2 | SecondThread | 197 |

3 | Monogon | 195 |

4 | vovuh | 189 |

5 | Um_nik | 186 |

6 | pikmike | 185 |

7 | antontrygubO_o | 184 |

8 | Ashishgup | 182 |

9 | pashka | 169 |

10 | Radewoosh | 167 |

Hi everybody,

It's been exactly a year since MemSQL Start[c]UP 2.0 — Round 2, but I still have not received my T-shirt. Am I the only one with this problem?

The dates of algorithmic track of TopCoder Open 2015 are finally announced! A lot of changes were introduced in the rules:

1) There is no specific registration needed for the TCO15 Algorithm Competition.

2) The rule of receiving the automatic berth was changed a little bit

3) Regional onsite events were introduced. They will coincide with Algorithm Round 2. There will be four stages of Round 2 this year.

4) I have not found any information about T-shirts:(

5) There will be only 12 finalists this year. The rules of onsite finals were also changed. Thanks to ffao and cgy4ever for noticing that

TopCoder Open usually is a very cool competition, so don't miss it!

GL&HF!

Let's discuss problems here.

Here is very-very short explanation of my solutions.

**Die Hard 3**

Use dfs/bfs on a graph, where vertice is represented by a pair of integers, each of which denotes the amount of water in a jug.

**Chocolate in Box**

This problem requires very basic knowledge about game theory and nim game. It is also important to notice, that we can do exactly 0 or 1 optimal moves in one heap.

**String Function Calculation**

Let's build suffix array and calculate LCP array. Now we can calculate maximum of occurrences of a substring with some fixed length using some sets/multisets

**Savita And Friends**

Have no idea how to solve this problem. I tried ternary search, but obviously it won't give the correct answer. I'll be very grateful if someone posts his solution to this problem

**The crazy helix**

One can use treap to answer all the queries. However, i used treap to answer the queries of type 1 and 2. For the third type of query I used sqrt-decomposition on the queries.

Let’s look at all restraunts, where Rabbits can have their lunch. Let’s calculate the answer for all restraunts and choose the maximulm value among of them. We need to use formula descrbed in problem statement to calculate the answer for some particular restraunt. Time complexity of this solution is *O*(*N*).

Let’s calculate the number of letters with odd number of occurrences in *s*. Let this value be equal to *k*.

If *k* = 0, then first player can win immediately: he can easily build palindrome, placing equal letters in different sides of resulting string (he always can do it, because total number of all letters is even).

If *k* = 1 then first player can win immediately again; at first he builds palindrome from letters with even number of occurrences in *s*; after that he inserts the rest of the letters in the middle of built in previous step string.

Let’s proof very useful statement. If *k* > 1 our problem has the following solution: if *k* is even, than second player is winner; otherwise, first player is winner.

Let *k* = 2. At the beginning of the game first player can make move of two types.

Using move of first type first player can decrease *k* to 1 by erasing one appearance of letter with odd number of occurrences. But this move leads him to defeat, because after this move second player can build palindrome.

Using move of second type first player can increase *k* to 3 by erasing one appearance of letter with even number of occurrences. In this case second player can make similar move — he will erase the same letter. Since the number of moves of this type is finite, sooner or later first player will have to make a move of first type. After this move he loses immediately.

So, if *k* = 2, than second player is a winner.

Let *k* = 3. First player can decrease *k* to 2 by erasing the letter with odd number of occurrences. If second player will try to increase *k* to 3 again by erasing the similar letter, first player can decrease *k* to 2 again (he erases the same letter again). It’s easy to see that the last move in this sequence of moves will be the move of first player. So, first player always can change the game in such a way that *k* = 2. This position is losing position for second player and winning position for first player.

Now we can easily proof our statement for any *k* using mathematical induction.

So, we have quite easy solution with time complexity *О*(|*S*|).

**C. Little Girl and Maximum Sum**

Lets calculate for each cell of the initial array the number of queries that cover this cell. It’s claimed, that we should associate the cell with bigger value to the cell with bigger value in initial array. More formally: suppose *b* is an array, in *i* - *th* cell of which is written the number of queries that cover *i* - *th* cell. Suppose *а* is an initial array. Let’s sort those arrays. It’s claimed, that the answer in this case can be calculated with following formula:

Let’s proof this statements. We will take a look at some indexes *i* < *j*, and at elements, corresponding to shis indexes *a*[*i*], *a*[*j*] , *b*[*i*], *b*[*j*] (*a*[*i*] ≤ *a*[*j*], *b*[*i*] ≤ *b*[*j*]). Those elements add to the answer the following value: *a*[*i*]·*b*[*i*] + *a*[*j*]·*b*[*j*]. Let’s swap *a*[*i*] and *a*[*j*]. Now those elements elements add to the answer the following value *a*[*i*]·*b*[*j*] + *a*[*j*]·*b*[*i*]. Let’s take a look at the following difference:

*a*[*i*]·*b*[*j*] + *a*[*j*]·*b*[*i*] - *a*[*i*]·*b*[*i*] - *a*[*j*]·*b*[*j*] = *b*[*j*]·(*a*[*i*] - *a*[*j*]) + *b*[*i*]·(*a*[*j*] - *a*[*i*]) = (*b*[*j*] - *b*[*i*])·(*a*[*i*] - *a*[*j*]) ≤ 0.

So, swapping of two elements leads us to nonincreasing of the total result. This means, that our arrangement is optimal.

Now we need to calculate array *b* fast enough.

For this purpose one can use different data structures, which support segment modifications (segment tree, Cartesian tree and so on). But there exists much easier method.

Let’s create some array *d*. When we have query *l*_{i}, *r*_{i}, we should increase value *d*[*l*_{i}] by 1 and decrease value *d*[*r*_{i} + 1] by 1. In such a tricky way we increase all elements in segment [*l*_{i};*r*_{i}] by 1 After processing all of the queries we need to make a loop, which visit every element of array *d*. In this loop we can easily calculate all elements of array *b*.

Now we are ready to get the final answer. The complexity of author’s solution is *O*(*NlogN* + *Q*)

** D. Little Girl and Maximum XOR**

To be honest, I am surprised that problem D had so many accepted solution during the contest. The author’s solution uses dynamic programming. In this editorial I’ll explain this solution.

First of all we should convert *L* and *R* to the binary numeral system. Now we can solve our problem with dynamic programming, using the following state *d*[*p*][*fl*1][*fr*1][*fl*2][*fr*2], where *p* is current position in binary representation of our numbers *a* and *b* (this parameter is in range from 0 to number of bits in *R*), *fl* (0 or 1) is a variable, which shows if current value of *а* is strictly greater than *L*, *fr*1 (от 0 до 1) is a variable, which shows if current value of *а* is strictly less then *R*, *fl*2, *fr*2 are variables, which show the similar things for *b*.

Let’s use recursion with memorization for our solution.

Let’s define the base of recursion. If we have looked through all the bits, we should return 0.

Let’s define a recursive transition. We need to know, which bits we can place into binary representation of number *а* in *p*-th position. We can place 0 if the following condition is true: *p*-th bit of *L* is equal to 0, or *p*-th bit of *L* is equal to 1 and variable *fl*1 shows that current value of *a* is strictly greater then *L*. Similarly, we can place 1 if the following condition is true: *p*-th bit of *R* is equal to 1, or *p*-th bit of *R* is equal to 0 and variable *fr*1 shows that current value of *a* is strictly less then *R*. Similarly, we can obtain, which bits we can place into binary representation of number *b* in *p*-th position.

Let’s iterate through all possible bits’ values and check the result of xor operation. If it is equal to 1, we should add to the answer corresponding power of 2. We also need carefully recalculate values of variables *fl*1, *fr*1, *fl*2, *fr*2. We should choose maximum answer from all valid options.

Initial state for our recursion is (*P*,0,0,0,0), where *P* is number of bits in *R*.

I hope, my code will clarify all the obscure points.

I also want to say, that this approach is in some sense universal and can be applied to many similar problems, like this one

The complexity of algorithm is *O*(*logR*)

In Russian thread I saw another really nice solution, so I decided to include this solution to the editorial.

First of all, if *L* = *R*, than the answer is 0.

Now let’s consider case with *L* ≠ *R*. Let *R*_{i} be the *i*-th bit of *R*, *L*_{i} be the *i*-th bit of *L*. Let’s define *p* as largest number such as *R*_{p} ≠ *L*_{p} (we use 0-based indexation). Let’s take a look at all numbers in range [*L*;*R*]. It’s easy to see, that bits, that are higher than bit with index *p* are equal for all this numbers. Thus, those bits can not affect our answer, because their xor will always equal to 0.

Let’s build numbers *a* and *b* in the following way:

1) *a*: bits which are higher than bit with index *p* are equal to the corresponding bits of *L*, *p*-th bit is equal to 0, the rest of bits are equal to 1.

1) *b*: bits which are higher than bit with index *p* are equal to the corresponding bits of *L*, *p*-th bit is equal to 1, the rest of bits are equal to 0.

It’s easy to see, that *a* and *b* both lie in range [*L*;*R*]. It’s also easy to see, that xor of this numbers sets all bits, that are not higher than bit with index *p* to 1. So, our answer is maximum possible and is equal to 2^{p + 1} - 1

The complexity of algorithm is *O*(*logR*)

Java solution from AlexanderBolshakov

We can iterate through value of *p* using binary search. We can achieve time complexity *O*(*log*(*logR*)) in this way, but it wasn’t required during the contest.

**E. Little Girl and Problem on Trees**

One can see, that our tree is a set of chains, each of which starts in the root.

First of all we need to decompose our tree in chains using, for example, depth first search. For each vertex we should find out it’s depth and number of chain, which contain this vertex. For each chain we’ll use some data structure, which can fast enough change it’s elements and fast enough answer to the range sum query. For example, we canuse Binary Indexed Tree (BIT). We also need to create one BIT for root. This BIT is global: it’s information is actual for all the chains

Let’s remember problem *С*. In that problem we used array *d* for processing all the queries. We need to know values of elements of array *b* in that problem after processing all the queries. In this problem queries are online. That’s why we need to use BIT; it allows to change element and answer range sum query in *O*(*logN*) time.

Let’s learn, how to process queries, which require modification and queries, which require finding the element, using BIT.

BIT can make two types of operations:

*add*(*x*, *y*) — add value *y* to element with index *x*

*find*(*x*) – finds sum in range from 1 to *x*

Let’s consider, that we need to add value *val* to all elements in range from *l* to *r* . Than we should just make operations *add*(*l*, *val*) and *add*(*r* + 1, - *val*).

Let’s consider, that we have query which require printing the value of element with index *v*. Then we should just make operation *find*(*v*).

Now let’s go back to the initial problem.

During the processing query of type 0 we should check, if it affects the root. If query affects the root, we should carefully process this query in our chain and make necessary changes in root’s BIT. Otherwise we just process query in our chain.

During the processing query of type 1 we should just find corresponding sums in root’s BIT and in BIT for our chain. We should print the sum of this values.

Time complexity of this solution is *O*(*N* + *QlogN*)

That’s all. I’ll be very glad to answer to your question in comments.

Tutorial of Codeforces Round #169 (Div. 2)

Hy to all!

I need help. I want to find server with contests and judging system, which allows to hold personal trainings. Contest duration should be from 2 to 3 hours, and difficulty of the tasks should be comparable with CodeForces Div1 rounds. I am interested in complete problemsets. Do you know servers like described one? Any help will be appreciated.

Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2020 Mike Mirzayanov

The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform

Server time: Nov/27/2020 20:16:52 (h3).

Desktop version, switch to mobile version.

Supported by

User lists

Name |
---|