I failed case 47 of 160C - Find Pair and my 1306980 was the same as watashi's 1296996.
After hours I figured it out, it failed for a integer multiply overflow, which ruby would never have XD. I changed a few variable definition and got accepted.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3640 |
2 | Benq | 3593 |
3 | tourist | 3572 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 173 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
3 | awoo | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | SecondThread | 152 |
8 | pajenegod | 146 |
9 | BledDest | 144 |
10 | Um_nik | 143 |
I failed case 47 of 160C - Find Pair and my 1306980 was the same as watashi's 1296996.
After hours I figured it out, it failed for a integer multiply overflow, which ruby would never have XD. I changed a few variable definition and got accepted.
Название |
---|