You can check many solutions have passed main test also which was only 67 and now it has 100 test cases , don't you think solutions should be rejudged.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3640 |
2 | Benq | 3593 |
3 | tourist | 3572 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 173 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
3 | awoo | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | SecondThread | 152 |
8 | pajenegod | 146 |
9 | BledDest | 144 |
10 | Um_nik | 143 |
You can check many solutions have passed main test also which was only 67 and now it has 100 test cases , don't you think solutions should be rejudged.
Name |
---|
Some wrong solutions passed the weak tests. Surely they should be rejudged!
If my code fail on rejudge, what would happen to my rating..
Your ratings will have the same effect as if it has failed in system testing. (i guess)
hmn ok =((
Yeah. Looks like it. My code which passed D has the worst-case time complexity of O(n^2).
my code is o(n(log(n)^2)) so it may fail too =((
My submission also has TC of $$$O(n\log^2n)$$$, but it passed system tests (including hacks) when I resubmitted it today. Maybe, it can still be hacked, idk :)
We have the same idea but my code run in 1.3s =((
amul_agrawal Is there gonna be a rejudgement? I'm aware that uphacking usually doesn't affect on rating changes, but isn't accepted O(2e5^2) solutions not so usual case?