Rating changes for last rounds are temporarily rolled back. They will be returned soon. ×

nitin12384's blog

By nitin12384, history, 18 months ago, In English

The task is to find the position of any one peak element in a 2D integer matrix of size $$$m * n$$$, if a peak element exists. Adjacent elements are allowed to be equal.

An element is called peak if it is strictly greater than all of its adjacent elements. For element at position $$$(i,j)$$$, these elements are considered adjacent if they exist in the matrix :
$$$(i+1, j)$$$, $$$(i-1, j)$$$, $$$(i, j+1)$$$, $$$(i, j-1)$$$

Examples of peak:

$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;6$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
For this matrix, only one element is peak, element at position $$$(3,6)$$$

$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$5\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;7\;4\;2$$$
For this matrix, there are two peak elements, one at $$$(2,1)$$$, and one at $$$(5,4)$$$. You can find any one of them.

$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
$$$2\;4\;5\;5\;4\;2$$$
For this matrix, There is no peak.

A simple algorithm would be to linearly scan all elements, with the runtime of $$$O(m*n)$$$.
Is there any algorithm better than $$$O(m*n)$$$?

Some algorithms that don't work in this case.
  • Vote: I like it
  • +1
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
18 months ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +28 Vote: I do not like it

Let $$$M(i, j)$$$ be a matrix which has all elements $$$0$$$, except the element at $$$(i, j)$$$, which is $$$1$$$. Suppose there exists an algorithm that has time complexity $$$o(mn)$$$ (not just $$$O(mn)$$$). For all $$$mn$$$ distinct matrices $$$M(i, j)$$$, the answer for them is distinct, so this algorithm should be able to solve the following problem correctly: "given $$$(i, j)$$$, $$$(i', j') \in \{1, \dots, n\} \times \{1, \dots, m\}$$$, check if these pairs are equal". However, the algorithm makes $$$o(mn)$$$ accesses to the matrix, and hence can't distinguish between at least two $$$M(i, j)$$$-s for large enough $$$n, m$$$.