I've stumbled upon a version of this problem with smaller constraints on another site: 177 — G2 and managed to solve it using a naive approach (I believe it'd get me 30% of the points in this version aswell).
But I really want to know the intended solution that works with such large constraints, any help is appreciated, thanks
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
| 2 | Benq | 3580 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
| 6 | tourist | 3565 |
| 7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
| 10 | jiangly | 3467 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | adamant | 164 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 159 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
| 8 | SecondThread | 148 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
| 9 | orz | 145 |
The solution I can think of is rather advanced, it involves linear-time string matching (KMP or Rabin-Karp) and matrix exponentiation.
If we can perform Berlekamp-Massey on the result for small fibonacci strings (at least $$$|s_i| \le |S| \le 10\cdot |s_i|$$$), the templates made for the algorithm should be able to take case of the rest.