| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | jiangly | 3640 |
| 2 | Benq | 3593 |
| 3 | tourist | 3572 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
| 6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
| 8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| 9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
| 10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 8 | SecondThread | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Hi Codeforces,
In problem "Kefa and Dishes" (580D div 2), statements said that: "It is guaranteed that there are no such pairs of indexes i and j (1 ≤ i < j ≤ k), that xi = xj and yi = yj."
But in the 5th test case:
7 4 3 2 6 13 5 7 1 9 6 1 15 2 5 3 6 4 8
It's easy to see that x1 = x3. Was this test case invalid?
I think it's not a contradiction. Although it is x1 = x3, it doesn't mean "xi = xj and yi = yj" if y1 is not equal to y3. It means it should be (xi, yi) ≠ (xj, yj). It's just a coincidence but in yesterday's ACM-ICPC style contest I did exactly this type of misreading and I got 8 Wrong Answers.