What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | Radewoosh | 3759 |
2 | orzdevinwang | 3697 |
3 | jiangly | 3662 |
4 | Benq | 3644 |
5 | -0.5 | 3545 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3505 |
7 | tourist | 3486 |
8 | inaFSTream | 3478 |
9 | maroonrk | 3454 |
10 | Rebelz | 3415 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | adamant | 173 |
2 | awoo | 167 |
3 | SecondThread | 163 |
4 | BledDest | 162 |
4 | Um_nik | 162 |
6 | maroonrk | 161 |
6 | nor | 161 |
8 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
9 | Geothermal | 146 |
10 | TheScrasse | 143 |
What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
Name |
---|
What's the meaning of
k
in the code?It can be quadratic, for example this directed graph:
Initial node is connected with k nodes (with cost 1), these k nodes are connected with another node (middle)(with costs k, k — 1 , k — 2..., 1). Middle node is connected with another k nodes (with cost 1), which are connected to the final node (with cost oo, a.k.a. big enough).
Certainly middle node will be visited k times, and visiting it requires k operations, as it has k neighbours. So total complexity would be at least
.
If I understood the code correctly it wouldn't be difficult to construct O(2n) in a similar way.