my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
2 | Benq | 3580 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
10 | jiangly | 3467 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
4 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
Name |
---|
Here is an issue:
UPD: the second one should be
conn[v].size()-1
(notu
), as I understood from your code. I've just tested it, but it still gives RTE, but on test 29.UPD2: the second RTE has just been solved. The issue was in using the same
pos
for bothu
andv
. The new verdict is WA on test 33. See my submissions for more details.