jainprateek1's blog

By jainprateek1, history, 7 weeks ago, In English

Algorithm Given a string S of length n, the Z Algorithm produces an array Z where Z[i] is the length of the longest substring starting from S[i] which is also a prefix of S, i.e. the maximum k such that S[j] = S[i + j] for all 0 ≤ j < k. Note that Z[i] = 0 means that S[0] ≠ S[i]. For easier terminology, we will refer to substrings which are also a prefix as prefix-substrings.

The algorithm relies on a single, crucial invariant. As we iterate over the letters in the string (index i from 1 to n - 1), we maintain an interval [L, R] which is the interval with maximum R such that 1 ≤ L ≤ i ≤ R and S[L...R] is a prefix-substring (if no such interval exists, just let L = R =  - 1). For i = 1, we can simply compute L and R by comparing S[0...] to S[1...]. Moreover, we also get Z[1] during this.

Now suppose we have the correct interval [L, R] for i - 1 and all of the Z values up to i - 1. We will compute Z[i] and the new [L, R] by the following steps: If i > R, then there does not exist a prefix-substring of S that starts before i and ends at or after i. If such a substring existed, [L, R] would have been the interval for that substring rather than its current value. Thus we "reset" and compute a new [L, R] by comparing S[0...] to S[i...] and get Z[i] at the same time (Z[i] = R - L + 1). Otherwise, i ≤ R, so the current [L, R] extends at least to i. Let k = i - L. We know that Z[i] ≥ min(Z[k], R - i + 1) because S[i...] matches S[k...] for at least R - i + 1 characters (they are in the [L, R] interval which we know to be a prefix-substring). Now we have a few more cases to consider. If Z[k] < R - i + 1, then there is no longer prefix-substring starting at S[i] (or else Z[k] would be larger), meaning Z[i] = Z[k] and [L, R] stays the same. The latter is true because [L, R] only changes if there is a prefix-substring starting at S[i] that extends beyond R, which we know is not the case here. If Z[k] ≥ R - i + 1, then it is possible for S[i...] to match S[0...] for more than R - i + 1 characters (i.e. past position R). Thus we need to update [L, R] by setting L = i and matching from S[R + 1] forward to obtain the new R. Again, we get Z[i] during this. The process computes all of the Z values in a single pass over the string, so we're done. Correctness is inherent in the algorithm and is pretty intuitively clear.

Analysis We claim that the algorithm runs in O(n) time, and the argument is straightforward. We never compare characters at positions less than R, and every time we match a character R increases by one, so there are at most n comparisons there. Lastly, we can only mismatch once for each i (it causes R to stop increasing), so that's another at most n comparisons, giving O(n) total.

Code Simple and short. Note that the optimization L = R = i is used when S[0] ≠ S[i] (it doesn't affect the algorithm since at the next iteration i > R regardless).

int L = 0, R = 0; for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) { if (i > R) { L = R = i; while (R < n && s[R-L] == s[R]) R++; z[i] = R-L; R--; } else { int k = i-L; if (z[k] < R-i+1) z[i] = z[k]; else { L = i; while (R < n && s[R-L] == s[R]) R++; z[i] = R-L; R--; } } }

Application One application of the Z Algorithm is for the standard string matching problem of finding matches for a pattern T of length m in a string S of length n. We can do this in O(n + m) time by using the Z Algorithm on the string T Φ S (that is, concatenating T, Φ, and S) where Φ is a character that matches nothing. The indices i with Z[i] = m correspond to matches of T in S.

Lastly, to solve Problem B of Beta Round 93, we simply compute Z for the given string S, then iterate from i to n - 1. If Z[i] = n - i then we know the suffix from S[i] is a prefix, and if the largest Z value we've seen so far is at least n - i, then we know some string inside also matches that prefix. That gives the result.

int maxz = 0, res = 0; for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) { if (z[i] == n-i && maxz >= n-i) { res = n-i; break; } maxz = max(maxz, z[i]); }

Read more »

 
 
 
 
  • Vote: I like it
  • -28
  • Vote: I do not like it

By jainprateek1, history, 2 months ago, In English

Given an array A of N elements. Find the majority element in the array. A majority element in an array A of size N is an element that appears more than N/2 times in the array.

Input: N = 3 A[] = {1,2,3} Output: -1 Explanation: Since, each element in {1,2,3} appears only once so there is no majority element.

IF ANY MAJORITY FOUND IN THE ARRAY PRINT IT OTHERWISE PRINT -1.

CAN ANY SOLVE THIS QUESTION IN - TIME COMPLEXICTY O(N) SPACE COMPLEXICITY O(1)

Read more »

 
 
 
 
  • Vote: I like it
  • -32
  • Vote: I do not like it

By jainprateek1, history, 2 months ago, In English

THIS ALGORITHM IS VERY USEFUL.IF WE SEE TYPES OF PROBLEM LIKE FIND OF 2 NUMBERS FROM ARRAY WHOSE SUM IS EQUAL TO X.IF WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IS TWO POINTER ALGORITHM THEN THIS PROBLEM CAN BE SOLVED BY O(n^2) (ONE FOR LOOP INSIDE THE ANOTHER)where n is no. of element in array by two pointer algorithm we can solve such type of problem in o(n) for sorted array and o(nlogn) for unsorted array. if array is not sorted then we have to first sort the array because this algorithm is useful only for sorted arrays in this technique we use two pointer first one is pointing at the starting index and second one is at last index then we find sum of values at these pointers and we will compare this given sum if sum of values is less than given sum we will increment first pointer by 1 if our sum is greater than given sum then we will decrement the last pointer by 1; if we found our sum is equals to given sum then we will return iterate this while loop until(first pointer<last pointer)

BY THIS ALGORITHM WE CAN SOLVE SUCH TYPE OF PROBLEMS IN LESS TIME COMPLEXICITY AS WELL AS IN EASY WAY; FOR EACH BEGINNER ONE SHOULD N KNOW ABOUT THIS ALGORITHM

Read more »

 
 
 
 
  • Vote: I like it
  • -37
  • Vote: I do not like it