# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3851 |
2 | jiangly | 3634 |
3 | Um_nik | 3539 |
4 | slime | 3498 |
5 | ksun48 | 3493 |
6 | djq_cpp | 3486 |
7 | maroonrk | 3471 |
8 | MiracleFaFa | 3466 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3442 |
10 | Petr | 3426 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | -is-this-fft- | 183 |
2 | awoo | 181 |
3 | YouKn0wWho | 177 |
4 | Um_nik | 175 |
5 | dario2994 | 172 |
6 | Monogon | 170 |
6 | adamant | 170 |
8 | maroonrk | 169 |
9 | errorgorn | 166 |
10 | antontrygubO_o | 165 |
+1
1st and 3rd part must have the same length x |
0
Maybe that's the reason why he's still gray. |
+9
I print nothing and got WA at first... |
0
An edge from u to v doesn't mean that u is the parent of v if we build the tree from root 1 |
0
There's a template function in c++17 names "std::data", which makes your data variable ambiguous |
0
OMG... I tried to calculate the MIN danger, which should be 2^(n — v) where v is the vertices number of the max complete sub-graph, which is NP... it bordered me so long since I find that it's just a misunderstanding when reading this.... |
Name |
---|