# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3640 |
2 | Benq | 3593 |
3 | tourist | 3572 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3561 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3539 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3534 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3532 |
8 | gyh20 | 3447 |
9 | Rebelz | 3409 |
10 | Geothermal | 3408 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
+11
My solution: Look at one wi. If it is alone in the set there are S(n-1,k-1) ways of arranging the rest and the weight of wi is 1. Or wi isn't alone. Then first partition the rest there are S(n-1,k) ways of doing that. Then we place wi into one of those set and sum the sizes of these new sets. Together (sum wi)(S(n-1,k-1) + (n-1+k)S(n-1,k)). |
Name |
---|