| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
| 2 | Benq | 3581 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 4 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 6 | tourist | 3565 |
| 7 | maroonrk | 3531 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3482 |
| 10 | jiangly | 3468 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 8 | SecondThread | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
[SOLVED] Problem in understanding Magic Formulas(424C)
Hi,
I just read the editorial of Magic Formulas. I couldn't understand a particular formula in editorial.
In editorial it is written that,
.
But in question, the formula is given as,
.
I am not able to understand how these formulas are equivalent. Please help me understanding what I am missing here.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-29 10:27:15 | 9 | ||
| en1 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-27 12:32:16 | 674 | Initial revision (published) |
