Virtual contest is a way to take part in past contest, as close as possible to participation on time. It is supported only ICPC mode for virtual contests.
If you've seen these problems, a virtual contest is not for you - solve these problems in the archive.
If you just want to solve some problem from a contest, a virtual contest is not for you - solve this problem in the archive.
Never use someone else's code, read the tutorials or communicate with other person during a virtual contest.

No tag edit access

The problem statement has recently been changed. View the changes.

×
E. Subordinates

time limit per test

1 secondmemory limit per test

256 megabytesinput

standard inputoutput

standard outputThere are *n* workers in a company, each of them has a unique id from 1 to *n*. Exaclty one of them is a chief, his id is *s*. Each worker except the chief has exactly one immediate superior.

There was a request to each of the workers to tell how how many superiors (not only immediate). Worker's superiors are his immediate superior, the immediate superior of the his immediate superior, and so on. For example, if there are three workers in the company, from which the first is the chief, the second worker's immediate superior is the first, the third worker's immediate superior is the second, then the third worker has two superiors, one of them is immediate and one not immediate. The chief is a superior to all the workers except himself.

Some of the workers were in a hurry and made a mistake. You are to find the minimum number of workers that could make a mistake.

Input

The first line contains two positive integers *n* and *s* (1 ≤ *n* ≤ 2·10^{5}, 1 ≤ *s* ≤ *n*) — the number of workers and the id of the chief.

The second line contains *n* integers *a*_{1}, *a*_{2}, ..., *a*_{n} (0 ≤ *a*_{i} ≤ *n* - 1), where *a*_{i} is the number of superiors (not only immediate) the worker with id *i* reported about.

Output

Print the minimum number of workers that could make a mistake.

Examples

Input

3 2

2 0 2

Output

1

Input

5 3

1 0 0 4 1

Output

2

Note

In the first example it is possible that only the first worker made a mistake. Then:

- the immediate superior of the first worker is the second worker,
- the immediate superior of the third worker is the first worker,
- the second worker is the chief.

Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2021 Mike Mirzayanov

The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform

Server time: Jun/13/2021 11:11:03 (h1).

Desktop version, switch to mobile version.

Supported by

User lists

Name |
---|