Package for this problem was not updated by the problem writer or Codeforces administration after we’ve upgraded the judging servers. To adjust the time limit constraint, solution execution time will be multiplied by 2. For example, if your solution works for 400 ms on judging servers, then value 800 ms will be displayed and used to determine the verdict.

Virtual contest is a way to take part in past contest, as close as possible to participation on time. It is supported only ICPC mode for virtual contests.
If you've seen these problems, a virtual contest is not for you - solve these problems in the archive.
If you just want to solve some problem from a contest, a virtual contest is not for you - solve this problem in the archive.
Never use someone else's code, read the tutorials or communicate with other person during a virtual contest.

No tag edit access

A. Nearly Lucky Number

time limit per test

2 secondsmemory limit per test

256 megabytesinput

standard inputoutput

standard outputPetya loves lucky numbers. We all know that lucky numbers are the positive integers whose decimal representations contain only the lucky digits 4 and 7. For example, numbers 47, 744, 4 are lucky and 5, 17, 467 are not.

Unfortunately, not all numbers are lucky. Petya calls a number nearly lucky if the number of lucky digits in it is a lucky number. He wonders whether number *n* is a nearly lucky number.

Input

The only line contains an integer *n* (1 ≤ *n* ≤ 10^{18}).

Please do not use the %lld specificator to read or write 64-bit numbers in С++. It is preferred to use the cin, cout streams or the %I64d specificator.

Output

Print on the single line "YES" if *n* is a nearly lucky number. Otherwise, print "NO" (without the quotes).

Examples

Input

40047

Output

NO

Input

7747774

Output

YES

Input

1000000000000000000

Output

NO

Note

In the first sample there are 3 lucky digits (first one and last two), so the answer is "NO".

In the second sample there are 7 lucky digits, 7 is lucky number, so the answer is "YES".

In the third sample there are no lucky digits, so the answer is "NO".

Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2019 Mike Mirzayanov

The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform

Server time: Oct/15/2019 11:02:00 (e1).

Desktop version, switch to mobile version.

Supported by

User lists

Name |
---|