Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3648 |
2 | Benq | 3580 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
5 | Geothermal | 3568 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3530 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3520 |
9 | Um_nik | 3481 |
10 | jiangly | 3467 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 159 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Anybody took part in NAIPC 2016? Let us discuss the problems here.
I cannot understand this question. Can anyone explain to me why the second example gives an output of 4? What is the moving strategy here? Thanks!
I had a weird WA during Round #300 (B) for the test case 415
. I used the custom invocation tool and realized that ((int) pow(10, i))
when i=2
is equal to 99 and the number
becomes 100
instead of 101
. On my machine, the same code passed.
Name |
---|