I read somewhere that unordered maps are faster than normal maps. However when I was solving a question, the moment I replaced the map with an unordered map, it gave TLE. Here is the submission 262627698
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3845 |
2 | jiangly | 3707 |
3 | Benq | 3630 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3501 |
9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 171 |
2 | awoo | 163 |
2 | adamant | 163 |
4 | maroonrk | 152 |
5 | nor | 151 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
7 | TheScrasse | 147 |
7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
9 | Petr | 145 |
10 | pajenegod | 144 |
I read somewhere that unordered maps are faster than normal maps. However when I was solving a question, the moment I replaced the map with an unordered map, it gave TLE. Here is the submission 262627698
Hello, I was solving the question which involves finding Kth ancestor of a node in a tree using binary lifting. I was wondering if instead of binary lifting, is there something like n-ary lifting (n>2 ofc). Is it something which can be thought of and will it be more efficient?
Название |
---|