We have an N*N matrix, can we achieve better than transposing the matrix into an array, and then sorting it?
I did some online searching and found that quickselect eliminates the log factor, how can we extend quickselect to 2 dimensions?
→ Обратите внимание
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2024 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 13.05.2024 17:11:22 (l1).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
Convert the matrix to an array first, then use
nth_element(x,x+n/2,x+n). The overall complexity is the same as the input complexity, which has reached the lower bound.nth_element is $$$\Theta(n)$$$.
nth_element is $$$O(n) $$$, not $$$\Theta(n)$$$
You're wrong, it's $$$\Theta(n)$$$, because it takes at least a linear perusal of all the elements to determine the value of the nth.
Just use the Thanos algorithm: among $$$n^2$$$ elements of the matrix, select random $$$n$$$ and find their median with
nth_element;-)How can we efficiently select n random elements from the matrix without iterating over the full matrix?
And let's we want to extend the program, and find the smallest median among every submatrix of size K*K, how can we solve this?
binary search
With binary search wouldnt it be N^2*K*logK, but can we achieve N^2*K or better?
Auto comment: topic has been updated by MODDI (previous revision, new revision, compare).