Please subscribe to the official Codeforces channel in Telegram via the link https://t.me/codeforces_official. ×

Blank_X's blog

By Blank_X, history, 8 months ago, translation, In English

AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) is an instruction set extension designed for SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) operations. It's an extension of Intel's x86 and x86-64 architectures, providing wider vector registers and additional instructions to perform parallel processing on multiple data elements simultaneously.

In C++, you can leverage AVX through intrinsics, which are special functions that map directly to low-level machine instructions. AVX intrinsics allow you to write code that explicitly uses the AVX instructions, taking advantage of SIMD parallelism to accelerate certain computations.

Here's a brief overview of using AVX in C++:

  1. Include Header: To use AVX intrinsics, include the appropriate header file. For AVX, you'll need <immintrin.h>.
#include <immintrin.h>
  1. Data Types: AVX introduces new data types, such as m256 for 256-bit wide vectors of single-precision floating-point numbers (float). There are corresponding types for double-precision (m256d) and integer data.

  2. Intrinsics: Use AVX intrinsics to perform SIMD operations. For example, _mm256_add_ps adds two 256-bit vectors of single-precision floating-point numbers.

__m256 a = _mm256_set_ps(4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 8.0, 7.0, 6.0, 5.0);
__m256 b = _mm256_set_ps(8.0, 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0);
__m256 result = _mm256_add_ps(a, b);
  1. Compiler Flags: Ensure that your compiler is configured to generate code that uses AVX instructions. For GCC, you might use flags like -mavx or -march=native to enable AVX support.
g++ -mavx -o your_program your_source.cpp
  1. Caution: Be aware that using intrinsics ties your code to specific hardware architectures. Ensure that your target platform supports AVX before relying heavily on these instructions.

  2. Performance Considerations: AVX can significantly boost performance for certain workloads, especially those involving parallelizable operations on large datasets. However, its effectiveness depends on the specific nature of the computations.

Always consider the trade-offs, and profile your code to ensure that the expected performance gains are achieved. Additionally, keep in mind that the use of intrinsics requires careful consideration of data alignment and memory access patterns for optimal performance.

  • Vote: I like it
  • -23
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
8 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been translated by Blank_X (original revision, translated revision, compare)

»
8 months ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +63 Vote: I do not like it

Seems like it's copied verbatim from ChatGPT. It would be much better to actually give examples of functionality that would make it useful for constant factor optimization in competitive programming (or any other purpose). As the blog is right now, it adds barely any value and portrays itself misleadingly as a useful blog. This is true of any ChatGPT generated content as of now — anything beyond surface level and it fails spectacularly.

Relevant to the content of the blog — it's usually enough to use pragmas that enable avx and avx2. The only time you would want to explicitly code using intrinsics manually would be when you're implementing an algorithm that is too complex for the compiler to reason about, or when you want to squeeze out extra performance that you are sure the compiler is missing. However, when you use intrinsics, it is often a significant amount of effort before you reach compiler-generated-code performance, let alone beating the compiler.