# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | atcoder_official | 149 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
6 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 144 |
10 | cry | 142 |
Name |
---|
I don't know, but 2349041 is your solution.
I replaced scanf() with cin>> and got AC. can't I use scanf() when i declare a __int64 type variable?
u can use scanf("%I64d", &x). but if ur compiler is g++ in linux, you may have to declare long long instead of __int64, and the input and output should be "%lld", but dont forget to replace "%lld" by "%I64d" when u solve problems in this oj. that's one of the difference between two compilers.