Rose_max's blog

Something about third-party code in Codeforces Round#604 Div1
By Rose_max, history, 4 years ago, In English

For Codeforces Round604 Div1 E，it can be showed that this problem is quite similar to a problem in Chinese Contest WinterCamp 2007，the code can be easily searched by Baidu or Google.

for example,the following blog posted the code in 2018 https://www.cnblogs.com/zhoushuyu/p/9146420.html

here is my submission,66347301,i used the code from the blog and change the input by myself

According to the rule about the Third Party code，i think i should not be unrated. MikeMirzayanov Please investigate this matter，Greatly thanks

PS: Mike didn't answer me for 40 hours.. It really makes me anxious..Please help me..

It is fixed now,really thanks.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +84
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

mike still didn't contact me

please.. Does anyone know how to let mike know?greatly thanks

→ Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -8 Vote: I do not like it

Hi mike MikeMirzayanov,Could you help me with this?

i am really anxious..lol

→ Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +25 Vote: I do not like it

You didn't even describe what happened. I'm guessing that you used some code from the Internet and you got disqualified? If that's the case then yeah, you should be un-disqualified because using public code is ok, right?

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Yes.. Sorry i thought that i have told the facts..

    i used some code from internet and got disqualified,so i think i should be un-disqualified

    → Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Rose_max (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Rose_max (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +49 Vote: I do not like it

Fixed now.

→ Reply