# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 162 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 157 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | orz | 146 |
9 | Petr | 145 |
9 | pajenegod | 145 |
Name |
---|
The point is that k <= 7. So it easy to proof that there would be exactly 2 edges between different trees in any cycle. Now we just need to calc d[x] — how many path of lenth x there are in both trees and the answer would be summ (x = 1 .. K — 3) 2 * d1[x] * d2[k — 2 — x] / n / (n — 1).