№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 157 |
4 | maroonrk | 154 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
5 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | TheScrasse | 145 |
9 | nor | 145 |
Название |
---|
A little more than an hour remaining till registration closure
Will you provide screencast as for previous SRM's?
Why do you need a screencast? Is it help you to solve problems?
In screencast you could see how ideas are growing, you could see places, where solver made a mistake and where write something just in seconds. You could understand why solver choose this way of solving. Also you could understand why was chosen special idioms/classes/collections of concrete programming language.
Everybody could write an analysis after solving a problem. Great screencast is much rare thing.
Yeah, this is exactly why watching Egor's screencasts is a pleasure
probably put a minus those who watched a screen cast, but does not know about the possibility of rewinding and viewing on the speed of 2x-16x.
Ideas grow in your head or on a paper, you see nothing but coding warching a screencast.
Spending an hour and twenty minutes practicing is much more better idea.
I say what I know, not what I assume. I watched a few screen-casts and I think is useful to do this several times a year. Why not?
No, I would write from 2 monitor setup this time