Getting TLE on test case 8 for this problem. I read the editorial which had O(n) complexity. My soln has a complexity of O(n *log n) but as n has an upper bound of 2e5 it should pass right (if it is correct)?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 165 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | orz | 146 |
9 | SecondThread | 145 |
9 | pajenegod | 145 |
Getting TLE on test case 8 for this problem. I read the editorial which had O(n) complexity. My soln has a complexity of O(n *log n) but as n has an upper bound of 2e5 it should pass right (if it is correct)?
Название |
---|
The link isn't working
My bad....updated
This "cur=cur+t[nc];" works for O(|cur|) Change it to "cur+=t[nc];".
I would have never found it.......Never thought about it in terms of complexity before this....Thanks
Auto comment: topic has been updated by AbhishekAg (previous revision, new revision, compare).