Problem
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 165 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | orz | 146 |
9 | SecondThread | 145 |
9 | pajenegod | 145 |
Name |
---|
hmmm... i think if you could give us the link to the problems judge, it would've been a lot easier... :)
An efficient way of solving this problem(instead of O(n)). Can you provide the link to the ques so that i can verify my ans?
My Code
Sorry, this problem appears in the OA of ByteDance So, I don't have a link. But Could you PLz Explain your Approach Thanks.
Instead of allocating memory for each second i.e O(n) we can directly make a jump of i seconds. we choose that value of i after which the maxm(m1,m2) changes.
we will remove i' units i.e sum of n natural numbers upto i — (already removed units upto prev. seconds).
i is calculated using quadratic equation i*(i+1)/2=difference reqd.