### Supermagzzz's blog

By Supermagzzz, history, 12 months ago, translation,

1538A - Stone Game

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1538B - Friends and Candies

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1538C - Number of Pairs

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1538D - Another Problem About Dividing Numbers

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1538E - Funny Substrings

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1538F - Interesting Function

Author: Supermagzzz, Stepavly

Tutorial
Solution

Author: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

• +55

 » 12 months ago, # |   +9 thanks for quick editorial
•  » » 4 weeks ago, # ^ |   0 bro in problem c why we are subtracting ans when 2*arr[i] is within the range[l,r]???
•  » » » 3 weeks ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Because if 2*arr[i] is in [l, r], itself is added to answer, but you can't select a element twice in one time. So you should subtract itself.
•  » » » » 3 weeks ago, # ^ |   0 got it thanks!
 » 12 months ago, # |   +77 MikeMirzayanov is that your short solution for D? Lol
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 This is my code. https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119791902
•  » » » 6 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hey can you please explain your logic SpoilerI did not got the editorial
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Have a look, if you want. https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/120844896
 » 12 months ago, # |   +6 I saw F so late ugh, sucks to miss on easy points
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +7 add high rated friends xd
•  » » » 10 months ago, # ^ |   0 how will that help?
•  » » » » 10 months ago, # ^ |   0 high rated people are fast, so you can get an idea of which question to solve next. you can also check problem page for no. of solves but I check standings more so..
 » 12 months ago, # |   +12 Great contest, I solved problem C with two pointers. Calculate the total number of pairs = (n *(n-1))//2, now calculate the pairs sum < L (using two pointers) let's call it A and calculate the pairs sum > R with the same approach let's call it B. So our answer will be total pairs — (A+B). Submission
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 can you please help me why is my code giving tle. i implemented lower and upper(well basically upper--) and from i=0 to i=n i calculated how many to right satisfy the criteria.submission edit: this is the submission not the above
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Comments in my solution may help :) submission
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Dude link you gave opens my submissions page wth?
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 sorry , please have a look now
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Instead of passing vector in functioneither make it global and use it's value or put your lower and upper function inside solve.I think you are getting tle since your code copies whole vector every time you call lower() and upper() function.I edited your code, it runs fine now.Link to edited code
•  » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 can you help me with c#?im using two pointer technique for problem C but im get TLEthis my link submission https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119312558
•  » » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 logic is wrong your code is running n^2if array is : 3 3 3 3 3 3 and l is 1 and r is 100 then your code will run n^2 times
•  » » » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 thanks, i Will fix my code
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Passing vector to a functionThis link would help you.
•  » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 god that trivial mistake. just missed it. thanx man
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I did solve with two pointers directly (almost). I count all valid pairs (i, j) and (j, i) then subtract valid (i,i) and divide by 2. 118994288
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 How does the condition l<=2*v && 2*v>=r help in finding valid(i,i)??Can you please elaborate.
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Oh, never mind. Got it! Sorry for the trouble.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 what is L and R?
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 l is current index i and r= n-1 since i am searching for all numbers which can pair up from i+1 to n
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks [user:_PeakyBlinder_]your two pointer solution was great .
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 thanks mate u r amazing
 » 12 months ago, # |   +2 Amazing problem set
 » 12 months ago, # |   +8 I like the solution to E, looks pretty simple, I thougt it would be much more complecated.But binary search in G is unclear, I cannot see the trick from the formulars. Why a ternary search does not work? And how does the function work on thats result we can binary search?
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Pretty sure a ternary search doesn't work because function isn't strictly increasing then decreasing, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 In my understanding there are two lines, and the optimum is reached where they cross. So it is non decreasing until that point, and non increasing afterwards.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 4 →   +6 u can binary search for the maximum number of gift sets. Let a < b and diff = b-a . Let the number of gift sets equals n, n is valid if and only if we can put n items which size = diff into 2 knapsacks which sizes = x-(a*n) and y-(a*n) https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119046681
•  » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I did read some texts, watched a video... but still do not get how/why binary search works here. The code inside the while(l= m) l = m; else r = m-1; 
•  » » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I misread the input and used a, b as the total number of candies and x, y as the number of candies per gift set . But the logic remains the same
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +6 ternary search works but you have to use real numbers https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119051522
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 That is what I tried to implement in my first submission Seems there is some implementation issue, maybe caused by rounding problems.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I should have been clearer what I extended was the codomain, not the domain.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I just noticed by the wayDiv3 is supposed to be unrated for anyone who "have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating."You do have such a point. But you gained rating in round 719
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Nah, you mix up two different things.It is rated for people up to 1600, current rating. And you are trusted up to 1900. Also current rating.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Yeah... my badFor some reason I believed that it is unrated for anyone above 1600 now or 1900 any time in the past.
•  » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 You can check, just go below 1600 once... ;)
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 It has a greedy solution if you're interested. first take the max(a,b) from max(x,y), and min from min. once they cross each other, or are equal,take sizes alternately like (b,a) (a,b). the submission is not clean, but it works. link
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 clickred, blue, a, b given input let answer = m then any < m is also a valid answer let x + y = m x type of (a, b) y type of (b, a) x of type (a, b) => x * a + x * b y of type (b, a) => y * b + y * a x * a + y * b <= red x * b + y * a <= blue by this (x + y) * (a + b) <= red + blue => 0 <= m <= (red + blue) / (a + b) put y = m - x x * a + (m - x) * b <= red x * b + (m - x) * a <= blue (a - b) * x + m * b <= red (b - a) * x + m * a <= blue x <= (red - m * b) / (a - b) x >= (m * a - blue) / (a - b) so if any such x exist then return 1 else 0 https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119207131
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 N/A
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +5 division is done because the same pair will be counted twice and not sure but the condition checks that if we should not count the same index value as we should have two value from different index
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 While performing binary search for the numbers that fulfill the condition of a[i]+a[j]>=l && a[i]+a[j]<=r, it may occur that the number itself also fulfills this condition .So to resolve this we check if the number itself fulfills the condition ( a[i]+a[i]=2*a[i] ) and if it is so we remove one pair. 2)This is done because in the question it is mentioned that i=j also the pairs are calculated. This means that all pairs are counted twice. To remedy this we divide our final ans by 2.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 N/A
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Everything makes sense, but theres just one thing I don't get and it would be a great help if you would explain it to me: Taking the example of v=1 1 2 5 5 10 and v[i] = 5 and i = 3, and l = 9, r = 13, We have r-v[i] = 8 & l-v[i] = 4, and the upper_bound(r-v[i]) = 5 and lower_bound(l-v[i]) = 3. So instead of adding in 3 elements in the range of 4 — 8, why are we adding 2 elements? And how does this work?
•  » » » 9 months ago, # ^ |   0 thanks! :)
•  » » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 This means that all pairs are counted twice.But how can we be sure that pairs are counted twice..i mean instead of dividing by 2 , we could possibly divide by any no.(eg:1/x of segment is counted repeatedly).
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 learn about lower_bound and upper_bound !! great stuff imo!
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Basically in Problem C we have to find all the pairs in range L to R whose sum is in this range .So what we can do is that we can find all the pair till L-1 and all pair till R.now we can subtract the pair found and get our desired result in order to find the pair till sum x we can follow a two pointer technique whose algo is :step 1) assign low = 0 , high = n-1 step 2) while ( low < = high ) will be our bounding condition step 3) if sum at a [ low ] + a[ high ] < x then pairs between low and high would be our ans now we increment our low pointer step 4) in case sum at a[low] + a[high ] > x we decrement our high pointer the simplified solution is here : 119093049please see : you can use PBDS for the same
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 I can't understand it either, but I wrote it myself according to the explanation: int n, l, r; int a[maxn]; void solve(){ read(n, l, r); rep(i, 1, n) read(a[i]); sort(a + 1, a + n + 1); int res = 0; rep(i, 1, n){ int A = upper_bound(a + i + 1, a + n + 1, r - a[i]) - (a + i) - 1; int B = upper_bound(a + i + 1, a + n + 1, l - 1 - a[i]) - (a + i) - 1; // debug(A, B); res += A - B; } cout << res << endl; } Look at the complete code
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   +1 To better understand this try thinking like this: Sort the array Now for each index, think of two pointers on the right: to get left limit substract l - v[i], similarly to get right limit r - v[i]. (imagine to get sum as l we have to get numbers greater than or equal to left limit and to get sum as r we have to get numbers upto right limit. lower_bound and upper_bound for perfect for this as they get these values in log(N) time. after getting values check for extreme cases and also we dont want to check for previously calculated values, (keep between i+1 and n-1) count numbers in the range of left limit and right limit by substracting their indices. sum up all to get final answer. void solve (){ int64 n,l,r,ans=0; cin>>n>>l>>r; vectorv(n); for(auto&i:v)cin>>i; SORT(v);//step 1 for(int i=0;ilow)low=lowpos;//step 5 for lower limit if(uppposi && v[upp]>right)upp--; //we can also get this by linear traversing but it takes //but it takes O(N) time //dont count for current index if no numbers exist for current number if(low==n)continue; if(upp<=i)continue; ans+=upp-low+1;//step 6 count sum } cout<
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 N/A
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 In fact [user:pratyushggupta] , you could just simply do this long long solve(){ int n , l , r ; cin>>n>>l>>r ; vector a(n) ; for(int i = 0 ; i < n ; ++i) cin>>a[i] ; Sort(a); long long ans = 0 ; for(int i = 0 ; i < n ; ++i){ ans += upper_bound(a.begin() + i + 1 , a.end(), r - a[i] ) - a.begin() ; ans -= lower_bound(a.begin() + i + 1, a.end(), l - a[i] ) - a.begin() ; } return ans ; } 
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 We are checking if the pair (v[i],v[i]) is valid I.e v[i]+v[i] lies in the range.If it is then answer must be decreased by 1 because we would have included that case when we are finding the upper bound. And ans/2 is because we would have included both the pairs (a,b) and (b,a). So the actual answer is 1/2 of what we have obtained in the for loop.
 » 12 months ago, # |   -12 Problem F is arguably easier than problem A Got stuck at A for a long time :(
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 My solution to C using policy-based ds. code
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Thank you so much, I was searching for this
 » 12 months ago, # |   +16 Editorial for D is wrong, $n$ should be the sum of exponents of prime divisors instead of the number of prime divisors.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   -13 That's the same thing, since we count ALL prime divisors, not just distinct ones.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +9 Well, probably you can argue that we define prime divisors of a number as a multiset, but it is really weird (at least for me).
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +5 I fully agree to you.
•  » » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 One thing seems weird in D. if a==b then shouldn't k be equal to 0 ? so like since it is not mentioned that when they are equal we stop... maybe this is the reason, but dont we sort of generally stop when we reach the condition a==b? in any other q for eg
•  » » » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 No k shouldn't be equal to 0 , as you can still divide no.s from a and b if a==b
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I thought the same way
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 deleted
 » 12 months ago, # |   +40 Massively overcomplicated solution for F. This passes.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 hey just wanted to know whether problem F was a digit dp problem ??
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I complicated it so much and solved it using digit dp
 » 12 months ago, # |   +15 Why is the provided implementation for F so long and far-removed from the description? For example, my short implementation is here, and is immediate from the description in the editorial: 119035674
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +17 We think alike :)
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +3 Same Here 119015785
•  » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Can someone help me find the testcase where this code 119549893 fails for problem F. What am I doing wrong? Upd: Got it.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +11 Another solution was inserted into the analysis. Fixed now
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 I think you only need R != 0 because $R \geq L$ so $R$ can only be $0$ when $L$ is $0$
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I feel dumb for getting WA 4x, only because of forgetting to use long long instead of int at problem C :v
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 #define int long long Hope it helps :p
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Its the same, either use "#define int long long" to stop getting WA but then you will get TLE on particular questions or try to remember using long long according to constraints and get WA sometimes. I prefer second, improves "attention" for other twists in other type of constraints too.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 it help in 1e9 integer overflow
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 did the same mistake ;;
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Less cumbersome implementation for D. code
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Are you asking for it? here
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I had a doubt- how to decide the upper limit of the prime numbers we need? (1000009) in your case.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Its sqrt(10^9) in this case, I took 10^5 just to be safe.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 anyone can point out mistake in F ? 119076961
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Problem F solution with simple explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c_dVBCBJSo&t=312s
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 i think naitikvarshney use invalid input for hacking solution of problem C. he have already hacked 95+ solution(including me). :+(
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Your code got hacked due to Arrays.sort() function which in worst case have O(n^2) time complexity.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Another problem with Java Arrays.sort() :/
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +4 Is it really necessary to hack all your victims during the hacking stage to disqualify their solutions? Aren't successful hacks used as a part of system tests anyway? Or am I missing something?
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +5 But hacking others gives a sadistic pleasure.
•  » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Profile picture checks out.
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 What kind of sort in Java is guaranteed n log n?
•  » » » » 7 months ago, # ^ |   0 Use Collections.sort(), it will work
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 buy a new laptop and start with C++
 » 12 months ago, # |   -13 Problem C video Editorial (using Binary Search) link : https://youtu.be/_2-iretTWqc
 » 12 months ago, # |   +6 Thanks for such an interesting contest!
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Looks like the code for problem D is wrong , Please correct it , the main issues are in Solve function where there are brackets but no for loops . MikeMirzayanov
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Here is an easy to understand solution 119087228.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks , I too had O( T * sqroot( Max(a,b) ) solution but it TLEd as it had a bit bigger constant factor.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I was initially doing same as yours but getting TLE(on test 6). Later came to know we have to use prime seive to get max count in O(T*log(max(a,b)) Otherwise, time complexity would be O(T*sqrt(max(a,b)). I wonder how yours got accepted. XD
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I kind of applied the same logic in D, but not able to pass the tests. Can anyone tell me what am I missing link
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Your code marked all of the cases with $a$ equals $b$ as a no. But actually, there may be some cases when $a$ = $b$ and the answer is yes. For example:$1$$2$ $2$ $2$
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks, missed that condition, just now realized that if K>1 and a and b are equal then also the answer is yes.
 » 12 months ago, # |   +1 We can also use linear programming optimization for problem G to solve it in O(1).
 » 12 months ago, # |   +15 For 1538G - Gift Set following solution pass tests. We have following set of restrictions n*a+m*b <= x m*b+n*a <= y n+m -> max n, m are integers Forget for a moment about last requirement (n, m are integers). Then, first two restrictions is basically region on n,m coordinate plane. And n + m is cost of each point within allowed region. Then, we can draw lines of fixed cost D: it's all point with cost D = n + m. Cost = 1 is line 1 = n + m. Cost 2 is line 2 = n + m and so on. It's easy to see that all of them are parallel, and when you increase D you actually move line perpendicular to it. Given line with cost 0 is 0 = n + m we know that cost of any point is actually distance to this line (n + m = 0).So, we want to find point within region with highest distance to the line n + m = 0. What about region we have? It's convex polygon. Thus, largest distance to the line is equal to distance to some vertex of our polygon. So, if we forget about integer n, m, we can pick this vertex as answer. This is actually explanation how linear programming works in 2D space.What can we do with integer n and m? Well, I just did hack: round n in arbitrary direction and tried few other integers around and this passed. 119052049 The question is: is it valid solution or is there counter test?
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Integer Programming in general is NP-hard. Just searching few points around the linear programming solution does not guarantee (integral) optimal solution.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +6 This should be correct. In this particular case, as we move away from the intersection point, we get closer to the $n + m = 0$ line, since one of the lines has a slope less than $n + m = 0$ and the other has a slope greater.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 It's more like intuition instead of formal proof. I would like to have formal proof, and here it is (at least some sort of). Messy long proofThere are two big cases: intersection of two inequalities exists and its both coordinates are positive. the region is triangle. I'll focus on first case. Suppose we have intersection at coordinate (n, m), then if we round down both we will get $n_1 = \lfloor n \rfloor, m_1 = \lfloor m \rfloor$. Upper bound on answer is $\lfloor n + m \rfloor$, and after throwing of fractional part it's easy to see $\lfloor n + m \rfloor - (n_1 + m_1) \leq 1$. In other words, either we have optimal answer or we're off exactly by one. If this difference is zero, then we already have optimal answer. If this difference is 1 let's check points $(n_1+1, m_1)$ and $(n_1, m_1+1)$. If any of them fits our requirements then this point is optimal answer. If none of them fits our restriction, then I claim there is no point $(u, v)$ within region with integer coordinates and $u + v = n_1+m_1+1$.Here is proof. Notice that fractional part of n plus fractional part of m is greater or equal to one. In other words $n - n_1 + m - m_1 \geq 1$. It's region with point $(n, m)$. Let's find out what region of plane it is. Border line of this region goes through two points we checked: $(n_1+1, m_1)$ and $(n_1, m_1+1)$ (for verification just put this points into inequality), and also this is the line where all points with our goal: potentially better answer $n_1 + m_1 + 1$. Let's call this line 'goal line'.From vertex $(n, m)$ there are two outgoing lines of convex polygon. In case if $(n_1+1, m_1)$ doesn't fit our restrictions this means that one of lines goes through some point $(n_2, m_1)$ on side of cell where $n_1 < n_2 < n_1 + 1$. Left side of inequality because $(n_1, m_1)$ within region, and right side of inequality holds because otherwise $(n_1+1, m_1)$ would fit our requirements. But this point $(n_2, m_1)$ on side of cell is outside of our region of point $(n, m)$ which means this line of polygon crosses our 'goal line' with all potentially better points. Because 'goal line' is border line of region where $(n, m)$ located. And, two intersecting lines may intersect only once, thus only 'half' of our 'goal-line' (with n coordinate $\leq n_1$) potentially may fit our restrictions. (In some sense we cut off that part of goal-line which goes out of convex polygon)If we look at other polygon line outgoing from vertex $(n, m)$ it should go through $(n_1, m_2)$ with $m_1 < m_2 < m_1 + 1$. And argument repeats. Thus, only 'half' of our 'goal-line' (with m coordinate $\leq m_1$) potentially may fit our restrictions. And if we combine two restrictions, we get, that points $(u, v)$ on 'goal line' that might be better should satisfy $u \leq n_1$ and $v \leq m_1$ but none of points on 'goal line' fit this requirements because if we add two inequalities we get $u + v \leq n_1 + m_1$ but all points on 'goal line' is $u + v = n_1 + m_1 + 1$. So, there is no point on 'goal line' that fits our restrictions.What if region is triangle? Well, I don't know, probably something similar applies.With this proof code becomes a bit easier: 119096819 (three points enough)
 » 12 months ago, # |   +21 IN G, shouldn't the inequalities be x >= a*k + b*(n-k) and y >= a*(n-k) + b*k. Also, the second equation in the four-set of equations should have y and not x?
 » 12 months ago, # |   +1 I think there's no need of keeping length in E, because we can handle special cases by checking if the prefix or suffix's length is less than 3.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 E problem seemed very tricky
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 For C. I use Java, and write my own binary search, but got TLE? public class TaskC { public void solve(int testNumber, InputReader in, OutputWriter out) { int n = in.readInt(); int l = in.readInt(); int r = in.readInt(); int[] ary = in.readIntArray(n); ** Arrays.sort(ary); // O(n^2) very bad** long res = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { int low = lowerBound(ary, l - ary[i]); int up = upperBound(ary,r - ary[i]); res -= low; res += up; if (l <= 2 * ary[i] && 2 * ary[i] <= r) res--; } out.printLine(res / 2); } int lowerBound(int a[], int x) { int l= -1,r= a.length; while(l+1>>1; if(a[m]>=x) r=m; else l=m; } return r; } int upperBound(int a[], int x) { int l= -1,r= a.length; while(l+1>>1; if(a[m]<=x) l=m; else r=m; } return l+1; } Update: Got it.The sort() is O(n^2).I put numbers in List and use Collections.sort(). it works.
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thx! I have the same problem
 » 12 months ago, # |   +31 In G tutorial it should be, x >= a⋅k+b⋅(n−k) y >= a⋅(n−k)+b⋅k and similarly, the next two equations will be changed accordingly. Supermagzzz correct it.
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can someone tell me why my code is failing for problem C. It is the same logic as the editorial only with an extra condition. 119012335
 » 12 months ago, # |   +2 Could someone plz tell me as of why this submission of mine getting TLE whereas this one is passing?The second submission uses sieve and map to store the values, whereas mine uses normal sieve. Still contrary to what should have occured, he received AC.I have even seen submissions having the same implementation as of mine, but passing the constraints easily.. Why is this happening?
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +5 Now what i did is- changed my long long to int data type and got AC plus a near about 1/3 execution time.. I have never seen so much of a difference just because of the change of data types. :(Could someone please give an insight on the same.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Did you try it with a c++17 64 bit compiler? It is available on codeforces. Calculations with long long or long double data types are a lot slower.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Ya I did soResult remains the same but.This is the submission
 » 12 months ago, # |   +2 Editorial's code for D is an eyesore
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 D has lot of corner cases
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 4 →   +2 My solution to D is simpler I think  int pfact(int x) { int cnt=0; if(x%2==0){while(x%2==0)x/=2,cnt++;} for(int i=3;i*i<=x;i+=2) if(x%i==0){while(x%i==0)x/=i,cnt++;} if(x>1)cnt++; return cnt; } int m,n,x,y,z,k,t; int main() { ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false); cin>>t; while(t--) { cin>>x>>y>>k; int xx=pfact(x); int yy=pfact(y); if(xx+yy
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +11 sadly in contest I used long long it barely passed so I'm a little scared
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 thanks for telling, I will try to hack:) UPD : I cannot, it works fine.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 You're welcome it's better than waiting for tomorrow to know that it's TLE :P
•  » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Can you explain this line: if(x > 1) cnt++ Is this to include 1 as a divisor
•  » » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 No in any number there could be one prime factor bigger than sqrt like 11 without this line you won't count 11 as a factor
 » 12 months ago, # |   +2 Got thrown into another dimension while solving E.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Here D editorial solution is very complex.....Over the head... Btw It's not so complex how he show it!
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +25 For problem G I have some $O(1)$ solution.First, think about how we can solve the problem easily when constraints are $10^5$.($a <= b$, otherwise swap them) ($x <= y$, otherwise swap them)To solve this version we can easily brute force step by step and while we can create a new gift we will decrease $b$ from the higher one and $a$ from the remaining one this is optimal and proof left as an exercise to the reader.But when constraints are $10^9$ we can't brute force so let's look at this solution and see what happens.At first, let's assume $y - x <= b-a$ in this situation if we apply our brute force algorithm at each step higher one will change because $y-b <= x - a$ and their difference also won't exceed $b-a$ because $x-a-(y-b) <= b-a$,$x-y <= 0$ is true so for this type $x$ and $y$ we can solve problem with $(x/(a+b))*2 + val$, $val$ is 1 if at the last we can't decrase $(a+b)$ from $x$ and $x >=a, y >= b$And while $y-x > b - a$ this means we always decrease $b$ from $y$ so we can handle this until $y - x <= b-a$Here is my implementation 119099472
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 decrease b from the higher one and a from the remaining one this is optimal and proof left as an exercise to the reader. Can someone please prove it? I've done the same thing but couldn't prove it.EDIT: Never mind, got it now.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I don't understand the official solution, but your method is really simple and easy to understand.That’s amazing:)
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Is 10^4 * sqrt(10^9) complexity code acceptable everytime?
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I guess it's $10^4 \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{10^9}}{\log(10^9)} \approx 30\ 000\ 000$ if you only check divisibility from primes.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +1 Actually, $10^4 \cdot \sqrt{10^9}$ also passes 119014291 if you don't do anything extra.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Yeah, my code has passed too, but with 1544 ms runtime. I am little scared that will it pass on system tests or not :(It got passed, yay :)
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +9 For problem G, my solution is transfer the problem into an ILP problem, that is: $max. z = x_1 + x_2 \\ s.t. \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} ax_1 + b x_2 \le R\\ bx_1 + a x_2 \le B\\ x_1, x_2 \text{ are non-negative integer} \end{array} \right.$Treat it as a LP problem and then use Simplex to get the value of $x_1$ and $x_2$ when $z$ is maximized. Since $x_1, x_2$ could be float numbers, and I guess the answer for ILP problem will be around $(x_1, x_2)$, so I search a few integer points around $(x_1, x_2)$.(FST Warning
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 For bugaboo D, we can find all the primes till 1e5. There are less than 1e4 prime numbers in this range. Now, for each a and b, we check the divisibility with this list of primes. If none of the primes till 1e5 divide a, it means that 'a' itself is a prime number. Because any factor more than 1e5 would need a smaller factor less than 1e5, because 1e5*1e5 = 1e10, which exceeds the constrains on a and b. UPD — My code 119080458
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 how to find the sequence of primes <1e5 : for(i -> 1e9)????
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +4 We only need primes till 1e5 not 1e9. You can use sieve() and then store the primes in some vector.
•  » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 i did that but wrong on test 3 , I don't understand why I'm wrong, you can check help me, please
•  » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +4 You may have a look at MyCode (warning — it's messy)
•  » » » » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thank bro, maybe i should have done the F problem first, probably raised the rate <33
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 119103856 Can any body hack my submission for Problem G ? I didn't use binary search.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I think the problems should be sorted by increasing difficulty
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 10 →   +12 Supermagzzz, MikeMirzayanov, I think there is a typo in the tutorial of problem G: Maybe it should be $\frac{(y−a⋅n)}{b - a} ≤ k$ rather than $\frac{(x−a⋅n)}{b−a} ≥ k$, and $\frac{(x−a⋅n)}{a - b} ≥ k$ rather than $\frac{(x−a⋅n)}{a−b} ≤ k$.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I can hardly believe this is the difficulty of div3, but the problem is very good, I like it very much, thank you for your tutorial.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Is there a wrong about problem G in Codeforces Round #725 (Div. 3) Editorial. In the tutorial (x−a⋅n)b−a≥k may be (y−a⋅n)b−a≥k
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone tell which corner case I am missing in the solution to problem D? I am getting WA on token 1021 of test case 2. Here's my link 119065848. Thanks.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 if(k==1&&a!=1&&b!=1&&(a%b!=0&&b%a!=0))cout<<"NO\n"; 
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Bro, I covered all corner cases still getting WA, c=this case also I have covered. Can you point out any possible case I am missing. Thank you. int p=max(a,b),q=min(a,b); if(p%q==0 && k==1) { cout<<"YES"<<'\n'; continue; } if(factors(p)+factors(q)>=(ll)k && k!=1){ cout<<"YES"<<'\n'; continue; } else cout<<"NO"<<'\n';Submission link: https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119430768
•  » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 In your factors function you should write while(a%2==0) instead of while(a%2!=0) so it's just a typo not logic mistake and you may get tle because in for loop you are writing i++ instead of i+=2 this i++ makes dividing a by 2 in the while loop pointless
•  » » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks a lot.
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 I solved C using 2 hash maps . One that stores the difference of the minimum sum and arr[i] and second that stores the difference of maximum sum and arr[i]. and then for each arr[i]. Found the number of integers in the array so that they are between low[arr[i]] and high[arr[i]]. But I was not sure if it was fast enough to pass the system tests. I would be grateful if anyone can hack it! [EDIT] here is the link to the solution 119064844
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 if(k==1) ans can be YES if one of n,m is 1. Also tha ans is not always no for n==m.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I didnot get you... What is k?
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 also k can be 1 if n%m ==0
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +3 use Java in C, about Arrays.sort()AC Long[] arr=new Long[n]; Arrays.sort(arr, Long::compare); TLE long[] arr=new long[n]; Arrays.sort(arr); 
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Can anyone tell, why it happens. even I am facing same issue, why its TLE while using long[] and passes on using Long[] ?Confused. Need help
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 You can take a look at the Java source code for Array.sort(). You will find that when using long[] it is DualPivotQuicksort, and Long[] is TimSort. In the worst case, DualPivotQuicksort is still O(n^2), while TimSort is O(nlogn).
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can anyone please point out mistakes in D's code? 119088308 It's failing on the 5053rd token in test case 2. UPD: Got it, thank you!
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can you tell me why it was failing ? I'm getting same error. UPD : I GOT IT
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I got a tle in D because of using long long instead of int.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 exactly, me too!but while practice, just figured it out!Converted it to int and it got AC
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Why, using long long would increase memory only and TLE could be understandable when recursions were used, but here no such cases are there. Please explain... I also submitted with long long only but it passed...119115670
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Such a nice contest with excellent editorial.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can someone provide me the test case of G where my solution fails 119117297
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119118611This is my dp solution of problem G . It is giving runtime error on testcase 5 that is for large x ,y and small a,b . could someone please tell the possible reasons for the error so that I do not repeat the same mistake again in future contests . Please .. Thanks in advance..
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I think it is giving Runtime error because for large values of x and y and a and b being small, the size of map would be greater than INT_MAX so you would not be able to store that many values and it is giving RE.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 is there a size limit for storing elements in a map ? also , could you please tell is there a way to fix this problem?
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Seriously I didn't liked the implementation of D given in the editorial. I simply used some tricks to speed up the sqrt(max(a,b)) solution and it was good enough to pass the tests. :)Here's the link of my submission : 119025249
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Lightning fast editorial.Kudos to the team
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 In problem F, I think solve two related problem which the number of changed digits in $[1, l]$ and $[1, r]$ is better. Than, we can use a simple subtraction to get the answer. If we focus on problem as $[1, x]$, we can find a way to calculate the ans: first, each digit can provide [ $11 \dots 11$ (the number of $1$ is $b$) $* 10^b - 1$ ] changes ($b$ mean the current number of digits), than, we add $n - 1$ to the result, n is n-digits, finally, we get the correct answer. For example, to problem $[1, 5678]$, calculate detail is: $(5 * 1111 - 1) + (6 * 111 - 1) + (7 * 11 - 1) + (8 * 1 - 1) + (4 - 1)$.The logic of this way is the same as editorial. Here is my code, this may be clearer than my comment.My Code
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 I think that the implementation of the problem D solution is complicated! I have implemented it in a simpler way. Here is my code:119017802
 » 12 months ago, # |   +4 Supermagzzz why are taking only a
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 can anyone tell whats wrong in my code for C in given input for 4th test case it is giving ans 0.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 here is my code link https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119128758
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 You forgot to sort the array. Submitted your solution after sorting and it got accepted. submission
•  » » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 thnks
 » 12 months ago, # |   -8 In problem G, why both of the equation is 1. x≤a⋅k+b⋅(n−k) 2. y≤a⋅(n−k)+b⋅k instead of x>=a⋅k+b⋅(n−k)y>=a⋅(n−k)+b⋅k ? MikeMirzayanov
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 The "x" on the G is wrong. It should be "y".
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Great contest!!I solved problem D using sieve of Eratosthenes, hope it helps!!Also, any suggestion for optimization in the code would be appreciated!!SubmissionID
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 In problem G's solution, if I don't write the floor function while calculating ll right and instead write it as ll right=((x — m * b) / (a — b)), then why am I getting wrong answer. The integer division should give me the floor value, then why are we using floor function explicitly. Can someone help. Thank you.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   +6 Let's say we get the range [3.5,5.5] because we're getting integersSo the left interval is going to be 4, and the right interval is going to be 5
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +8 Casting to an int will truncate toward zero. $floor()$ will truncate toward negative infinite. So, $int(-0.9) = 0$ and $floor(-0.9) = -1$
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Ok. So, can we say that, since the value here can be negative as well that is why we need to use floor. If it was guaranteed that the result will always be positive then we don't need to use floor function.
 » 12 months ago, # |   +3 Questions about D floor and floorl What's the difference and 1.0l?
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 I am a begineer on codeforces so forgive me if i have done a blunder . can anyone help to tell me why i am getting tle for d which i code today as practice on test case 2 here is the link to my solutionhttps://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119155153
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Luckily exact same code got accepted in pypy3 in just around 800 ms while the same in python 3.9.1 gave tle on only test case 2
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 why am i getting a tle for D. I did save the results from previous states to avoid tle https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119065595
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 In G, it will be better if taken r=(x+y)/(a+b)
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can anyone tell me why this 119163197 for D is giving tle and not this 119163156
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 It was my code and for python 3.9.1 it gave tle on test case 2 and i got ac in pypy3 with same code instantly .
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can any body tell me how k>=(y-a*n)/(b-a) while given equation was y>=(n-k)*a+kb I guess equation should be k<=(y-a*n)/(b-a).
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 The solution of problem C can be written more efficiently as you are going through the already visited pairs again and again in each iteration of loop so i slightly modified the code to be more efficient do see my code for the problem thanks :) here's my submission link
 » 12 months ago, # |   +1 The editorial for G seems to be incorrect. The second reordered equation is given as (x−a⋅n)b−a>=k but it should be (y−a⋅n)b−a<=k in my opinion.Also, I can't understand why we have used greater than or equal to in the first two equations. Can someone explain this part to me please? I think the equations should be : x>=a⋅k+b⋅(n−k)) and y>=a⋅(n−k)+b⋅k
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can someone explain me what is going on with the solution code for problem D? I understood the editorial but didn't understand the code.Here is a list of the things I think I've understood: - precalc() generates a sieve. - calcPrime(n) returns the size of the "largest prime factorization" from which we can obtain n. - decompose(n) decomposes n into the "largest prime factorization" from which we can obtain n.But what do these parts do?This part of the main function: { int t; int ta = 1; while ((t = __gcd(a, g)) != 1) { a /= t; ta *= t; } high += calcPrime(a); if (a != 1) { low |= 1; } a = ta; } { int t; int tb = 1; while ((t = __gcd(b, g)) != 1) { b /= t; tb *= t; } high += calcPrime(b); if (b != 1) { low |= 2; } b = tb; } The entire check function: bool check(const map &divs, map::const_iterator it, map &divsA, map &divsB, int low, int high, int k) { if (it == divs.end()) { return __builtin_popcount(low) <= k && k <= high; } for (int p = 0; p <= it->second; p++) { int pa = divsA[it->first]; int pb = divsB[it->first]; int nextLow = low; if (p != pa) { nextLow |= 1; } if (p != pb) { nextLow |= 2; } if (check(divs, next(it), divsA, divsB, nextLow, high + pa + pb - 2 * p, k)) { return true; } } return false; } Thanks in advance.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can you please explain O(1) solution to Problem G? (easy to understand if possible)
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Wished the editorial explained the "if (l <= 2 * v[i] && 2 * v[i] <= r) "... the edge cases should be included in the editorial too!
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 anyone can give me any good video tutorial about porbem E.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I am not getting editorial of D question. Is there any theory I need to refer or if someone has any other solution, pls help.
 » 12 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 What is the logic behind this line for problem C?  if (l <= 2 * v[i] && 2 * v[i] <= r) ans--; 
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Our condition is that l<= a[i] + a[j] <=r , where i and j are two pairs(i
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks, Brother.
 » 12 months ago, # |   +2 In problem G editorial i feel it should be x>= a*k + b*(n-k) similarly for y y>=a*(n-k) + b*(k) bcs x and y should have sufficient candies.I would be very happy if someone correct my intuition.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Please can anybody find out my mistake in problem D:My logic is to keep dividing a by 2 if it is even and increase count similarly keep dividing a by all odd numbers and increase count. Similar thing I will do for b. This count will be the maximum times I can divide a and b to get a=b=1.In my code max==2 is for the case when both a and b are prime numbers.My submission:https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119194346
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 If a == b and a is not prime then you are setting min = 1 but atleast 2 division operations will be required in this case.
•  » » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Ya I miss that case. Thanks!
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Very fast one line O(n log n) solution to problem C in Dyalog APL. ⎕IO←0 ⋄ {n l r←⎕ ⋄ ⎕←(r,l-1) -.{+/0⌈(⍳≢⍵)-⍨⍵⍸⍺-⍵} ⊂{⍵[⍋⍵]}⎕}¨⍳⎕ Try it onlineThis would be a great language to add.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I solved problem C using a data structure called ordered set in c++. It is like the normal set but has 2 more functions. one of its functions is a function called order_of_key() which returns the number of elements strictly less than a certain number in log(n) time so I used this function to calculate the number of elements less than 1 or (l — ai) in case ai is more than l and the number of elements less than (r — ai + 1) and then subtract these two numbers and add it to the answer.I saw other solutions which are faster than mine but I thought that this approach is cool to share
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Here's a slightly different way to do G. Let's say we make $l$ gift boxes first by removing $la$ red and $lb$ blue candies from the piles. (Each of these boxes contains $a$ red and $b$ blue candies.) Then, of the remaining $x-la$ and $y-lb$ candies, we can make $\min \left( \lfloor \frac{x-la}{b} \rfloor , \lfloor \frac{y-lb}{a} \rfloor \right)$ more boxes each containing $b$ red and $a$ blue candies.So in total, we have made $l + \min \left( \lfloor \frac{x-la}{b} \rfloor , \lfloor \frac{y-lb}{a} \rfloor \right)$ boxes. We want to maximize this, under the conditions $l \geq 0, x - la \geq 0, y - lb \geq 0.$It's not hard to show that this function (on the integers) is non-decreasing and then non-increasing, and that no three consecutive integer inputs of $l$ yield the same value. So, it's easy to binary search on to maximize this function.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Problem G: Gift Set. My solution is wrong for testcase 2.1103 It says it should be 0, but my solution gives 1. Could you, please, provide me with a testcase when my code gives a wrong answer? Thanks in advance.ll k = min(x,y)/min(a,b); ll v = (x+y)/(a+b);if (v < k) { cout << v << endl; } else { if (max(x,y)/max(a,b) >= k) { cout << k << endl; } else { cout << 0 << endl; } }
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 //my soln for c void solve(){ int n,l,r; cin>>n>>l>>r; vi a(n); for(int i=0;i>a[i]; sort(all(a)); int ans=0; for(int i=0;ir) continue; if(x=l){ int ub=upper_bound(a.begin()+i+1,a.end(),r-x)-a.begin(); ans+=ub-i-1; } } cout<
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone help me with task C: I'm stuck in understanding the problem of next code (just a brute force) as a central part of the solution: long long s = 0; for(int i = 0; i < n; i++){ for(int j = i + 1; j < n; j++){ if(l <= A[i] + A[j] && A[i] + A[j] <= r){ s++; } } } cout << s;it fails on test #2 with WA: wrong answer 1491st numbers differ — expected: '10', found: '0'I stress-tested this solution against the cononical solution and didn't find wrong example.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 I found a mistake :-)before this code there was a construction:cin >> n >> l >> r;if(n == 1){ cout << "0\n"; } else{ for(int j = 0; j < n; j++){ cin >> A[j]; } // solution code }so it didn't read input if n == 1 and therefore input for previous test was considered as input for next test.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 thanks for quick editorial
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 For G I felt compelled to speak about it.My idea for the problem is nearly the same till the part of binary search on the max answer.What I did next was since $a \ge b$ therefore an expression like $ap + bq$ where $p + q$ is a fixed value would yield a greater result for higher value of $p$ and therefore I decided to do another binary search on finding out the pair value $(p,q)$ which would cause the expression $ap + bq$ to be just below $x$ inclusive (as mentioned in the problem). This would cause the expression $aq + bp$ to be least and that's pretty much what we want to do since $aq + bp \le y$. My idea uses another log in time complexity due to running binary search within binary search but I found it to be a lot lesser troublesome in terms of implementation against using floor or ceilings and therefore I decided to comment on G.Link to my solution:- https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119120664
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 cool idea...But I didn't understand how the idea of maximizing the value p(in second binary search) gives optimal answer?
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   +1 You want to make sure the first expression is $\le x$ and second expression is $\le y$so if u maximize the first expression as you can to be just below $x$ it would cause the second expression to go as low as possible.. and that's what we want because it's always better to take a lower value for any expression.Actually you can also do that other way around maximize the $q$ but then you have to run binary search for maximizing the second expression. ($aq + bp$)
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 I don't understand why E had very few submissions. Wasn't it simple bruteforce and hashing? btw I did in python.
•  » » 12 months ago, # ^ |   0 Mee too In Python, it is quite easy.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 It seems like the editorial on problem F is incorrect. The inequalities should be: $x \geq k.a + (n-k).b$ and $y \geq k.b + (n-k).a$. Hope the author correct it.
 » 12 months ago, # |   0 Can someone tell me why does the binary search in problem G code work? I'm not very experienced with binary search. Suppose we only have three possibles values right now, [1,2,3], and 2 satisfies the if condition. Then, we update the interval to [2,3]. The code stops here returning 2 as the answer. Why doesn't it check 3 too? Can't it be a posible better solution?
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 In the editorial solution, l and r are taken as such that l <= n < r (where n is the req solution). So u don't need to check at r. U can look this
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 So updating r = m and not checking it as a solution is the same as updating r = m-1 and do check it. Got it. Thanks!
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 How can we sort the array in problem C, as we are distorting the given array indexes? Generally we don't sort in such pair of indexes problem right?
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Can anyone tell me why i am getting memory limit exceeded with my code in python forgive me if i did a big mistake . https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119263670
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Memory limit exceeded doesn't mean your code is wrong. The strings won't fit in some tests. Note that the input can be a first line with := and then 49 lines like x = x + x, so the string will need more than 2**49 bytes, and I believe 256MB to be 2**28 bytes, which is the limit for the problem.
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 so how could i make improvement to same program and is it possible this was the approach which first came to my mind .Now after posting this comment i saw the editorial and it is using some different approach which i am not able to understand that well .One thing which i am thinking about is counting substring after every iteration in the string and keep adding the substring which will be added after every iteration.
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 plase easy write to problem D?i can't understand.
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 There are some observations. Any number can be written as a product of its primefactors, and is divisible by all those primefactors, and all products of a subsets of those primefactors We can make the number a or b equals 1 in one operation, by choosing c equals to a or b, so we can make them both equal 1 in two operations. We can make the numbers a and b equal in one operation if a divides b or b devides a. The most operations we can do on a number until it equals 1 is the number of primefactors it has. From those rules above we can find a minimum number of operations, and a maximum number of operations. If k is in between them then ans="Yes".
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Sorry, didn't get this part. Why is this true? If k is in between them then ans="Yes". EDIT: I took one example and it's clear now.
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Can someone please explain the logic behind the solution for F.
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Hope this can be of help! :-)Take l = 1, r = 900.The lowest digit changes 900-1 = 899 times. See it as 001 -> 900. This is the number of 1's added!The middle digit will change 90-00 = 90 times. See it as 00 -> 90. If we had l = 60, r = 900 the middle digit will change 30 times, 60 -> 90. This is the 10's place digit changes given the number of 1's added. The highest digit will change 9-0 = 9 times. See it as 0 -> 9. If we had l = 600, r = 900 the highest digit will change 3 times, 6 -> 9. This is the 100's place digit changes given the number of 1's added.
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 A far simpler solution for Problem D:Simply count the total no. of prime factor and how many times they are repeating for example.48 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 => 2 ^ 4 * 3 ^ 1 => solve(48) => 5 (remember I added the power which is 4 and 1)36 = 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 => 2 ^ 2 * 3 ^ 2 => solve(36) => 4Maximum time we can divide both no. to make them equal (maxStep) => 4 + 5 = 9 The minimum times we can divide both no. to make them equal is calculated by below condition:-if both no are not divisible by themselves and are not equal then the minimum step required to divided them and make them equal is 1;else minimum steps are 2.below is the code for this particular logic:-int minStep = 2;if ((a % b == 0 || b % a == 0) && a != b) minStep = 1; Now, if the value of k lies between minStep and maxStep then print "YES" else print "NO";Here's the code. include using namespace std; int solve(int n) { map numbers; int max = 0; for (int i = 2; i * i <= n; i++) { while (n % i == 0) { ++numbers[i]; n = n / i; } } if (n > 1) { ++numbers[n]; } for (auto i : numbers) { max += i.second; } return max; } int main() { int tc; cin >> tc; while (tc--) { int a, b, k, minStep = 2, maxStep = 0; cin >> a >> b >> k; if ((a % b == 0 || b % a == 0) && a != b) minStep = 1; maxStep += solve(b); maxStep += solve(a); if (k >= minStep && k <= maxStep) { cout << "YES" << endl; } else cout << "NO" << endl; } return 0; } 
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Can problem C be solved by (set.upper_bound(r-*it)-set.begin())-(set.lower_bound(l-*it) — set.begin())+1? Ik that set.upper_bound(r-*it)-set.begin() generally gives the index but here its giving me a compilation error.can someone help?
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 can anyone please explain in problem C this: if (l <= 2 * v[i] && 2 * v[i] <= r) { ans--; }
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 can anyone explain problem G please, I'm having hard time with it. I do understand that the solution is binary search on answer, but couldn't understand how do we know if some value x can be an answer or not.
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 I have tried writing solutions in Java for this(I'm not familiar with it, like I am with C++).Could we have a list of tips&tricks to speed up our solutions? I have had many issues with TLE.So far I found: - Scanner is not always fast enough to get Accepted - same with Arrays.sort - long is very slowExperience: I wrote the same code for problem C like in the official solution, but apparently Arrays.sort gives TLE, even after I change the algorithm after sorting to an O(n) instead of O(nlogn).In problem D, I managed to write a solution to get accepted, but after changing long to int the solution goes from ~1100 ms to ~500ms. Lots of TLE before. If I use int, even unoptimized solutions pass(reads with Scanner, factorization without precomputing primes or even going through all even numbers as possible factors).Also, my lack of experience with Java showed in other ways: - I had to implement swap of two variables manually(I was not able to find the library version) - I had to implement upper bound and lower bound manually, again I could not find the library version - I do not have a fast, optimized read/write class to copy/paste in my solution(frankly, I don't even know which one would that be, there seem to be many options).
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 P.S.: Bulleted lists don't seem to work.
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Can someone give some hint on how to approach the Number of pairs by two pointer method?
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 I solved Problem 1538G in constant time complexity Link to solution: https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/119439571
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 I think we don't need to store the string length in E. It is not used neither in prefix/suffix computation, nor in count computation?
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 in problem c if we sort the array then aren't we working on a different array then what given in the input . I am bit confused about this please help
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Because no matter where we put an element, the number of pairs that we can make with that element won't increase or reduce and addition operation doesn't care about order.Suppose an original array of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Now, 1 can make pairs with 2, 3, 4, 5. (4 elements). Now we move 1 to the middle. 2, 3, 1, 4, 5. Now, 1 can make pairs with 4, 5. (2 elements). But now, 2 and 3 can also make pairs with 1 since it's move to their right (+2 elements) and we get 4 elements total with 1.It holds true for every element.
•  » » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 got it thanks for clearing my doubt u r great cf community is great
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Problem G"the maximum number of gift sets that Polycarp can make.", I should think about binary search, but I didn`t, what a pity, "maximun of" is a symbol of binary search.the inequality, we may have this:(bn-x) / (b-a) <= k <= (y-an) / (b-a) [1]or, may have this(an-y) / (a-b) <= k <= (x-bn) / (a-b) [2][2] is wrong, and [1] is right.because, we presume x < y, a < b, k need to be positivesomething else is about floor( ) and ceil( ),
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Hi folks, I keep getting TLE for my Java O(n*log(n)) solution for problem C: https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/120169883My solution and its time complexity seem to be in lieu of what the constraints and the tutorial say. Can someone please point me to what I'm missing?I saw a lot of TLEs for Java for problem C, one accepted solution is https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/120156779
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 How do you come up with that solution for F?
•  » » 11 months ago, # ^ |   0 Problem F solution with simple explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c_dVBCBJSo&t=312s
 » 11 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 .
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 How can I avoid TLE on my solution? I'm pretty sure it's correct otherwise. Would first checking if the number is prime before calculation help? My submission: 120410573
 » 11 months ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Can anyone explain what floorl and ceill are in the solution of problem G. And is 1.0l used to convert to float like 1LL/0LL is used to convert to long long. Thanks in advance!
 » 11 months ago, # |   0 Problem F solution with simple explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c_dVBCBJSo
 » 8 months ago, # |   0 where the wrong in that ?? 128818547//D
•  » » 8 months ago, # ^ |   0 found it.
 » 7 months ago, # |   0 I was solving problem C (Number of Pairs). I read the editorial. I had a feeling that some begginers like me may face some problems understanding the "if" part of the code. I used the same approach as discussed in the editorial but my implementation might be a bit easier to understand to logic behind the code. This is my submission. Hope it will be helpful:) https://codeforces.com/contest/1538/submission/132188971
 » 7 months ago, # | ← Rev. 5 →   0 Can Anyone tell me what is my mistake in problem 4 ?? - my solution — 134181698
 » 4 months ago, # |   0 Does anyone know why this (145191446) solution fails for problem G?
 » 3 months ago, # |   0 I implemented the solution for problem D, but I got WA. Could someone help me figure out where my code breaks?145908397
 » 3 months ago, # |   0 In problem G I think Inequalties should be x≥a⋅k+b⋅(n−k) y≥a⋅(n−k)+b⋅k
 » 4 weeks ago, # |   0 In c problem why we are subtracting ans by one when 2*arr[i] lie within the range(l,r)???