| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3947 |
| 2 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3627 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 6 | Benq | 3586 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3582 |
| 8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 10 | ksun48 | 3474 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | awoo | 163 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 3 | adamant | 156 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 154 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
| 6 | SecondThread | 148 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | nor | 145 |
| 10 | cry | 144 |
If String Hashing = valid, are heuristic valid sometimes to solve problems?
For this problem https://codeforces.com/gym/103708/problem/G, the "proper" way to solve it is to use Multi Dimensional Ternary Search.
If I were to solve it with random search (it passes: https://codeforces.com/gym/103708/submission/274048924 — very much easily), would this be considered a valid solution? I feel like saying no would invalidate the use of string / polynomial hashing but saying yes feels very much wrong.
What is the CP community opinion on this?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en5 |
|
JasonMendoza2008 | 2024-08-02 18:58:06 | 1 | Tiny change: 'is to use Multi Dime' -> 'is to use [Multi Dime' | |
| en4 |
|
JasonMendoza2008 | 2024-08-02 18:57:56 | 2 | Tiny change: 'ary Search (https://c' -> 'ary Search](https://c' | |
| en3 |
|
JasonMendoza2008 | 2024-08-02 18:57:29 | 30 | ||
| en2 |
|
JasonMendoza2008 | 2024-08-02 18:56:15 | 25 | Tiny change: '/274048924), would t' -> '/274048924 - very much easily), would t' | |
| en1 |
|
JasonMendoza2008 | 2024-08-02 18:55:43 | 547 | Initial revision (published) |
