I cannot understand this question. Can anyone explain to me why the second example gives an output of 4? What is the moving strategy here? Thanks!
NWERC 2010 Risk
I cannot understand this question. Can anyone explain to me why the second example gives an output of 4? What is the moving strategy here? Thanks!
Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en2 | Ra1nWarden | 2015-07-28 11:11:23 | 85 | |||
en1 | Ra1nWarden | 2015-07-28 11:10:45 | 237 | Initial revision (published) |