| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
| 2 | Benq | 3581 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3578 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | tourist | 3565 |
| 8 | maroonrk | 3531 |
| 9 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3482 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 161 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | SecondThread | 146 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Time Complexity for unordered_map{int,multiset{int}} and unordered_map{int,vector{int}}
If I use unordered_map<int,multiset> to store the values, it gives a TLE. In the same code, if I change it to unordered_map<int,vector>, and sort the map's value when taken into use (to act like multiset), doesn't give a TLE. How/Where is the time complexity different for both ?
P.S. — Pardon me if I did not follow the conventions of a blog, this being the first one. Would be happy to know about my mistakes.
