| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3845 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3630 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3501 |
| 9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| 10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | adamant | 163 |
| 3 | awoo | 161 |
| 4 | nor | 152 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 151 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 7 | TheScrasse | 148 |
| 8 | atcoder_official | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 144 |
Polygon API enhancement proposal
Hello, CodeForces!
Recently I was working on a Java library that implements interaction with Polygon API. It is very useful for some my tasks and it's cool that Polygon provides an API. But I discovered that is's kinda outdated. There are many new features in Polygon for which theres is no access through the API.
| Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:52:53 | 1967 | (published) | |
| en1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:58 | 349 | Initial revision for English translation (saved to drafts) | |
| ru1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:40 | 349 | Первая редакция (сохранено в черновиках) |
