№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3843 |
2 | jiangly | 3705 |
3 | Benq | 3628 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3571 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | jqdai0815 | 3530 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3499 |
9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 171 |
2 | adamant | 164 |
3 | awoo | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 157 |
5 | nor | 153 |
6 | maroonrk | 152 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | Petr | 145 |
9 | orz | 144 |
9 | pajenegod | 144 |
Название |
---|
3rd one the worst contributor from the last. Sorry..
They are different things though?
AFAIK DSU on trees is just the small-to-large trick applied to trees (you have an instance of a data structure on each node), and sack is more like HLD applied to MO's algorithm (you have a single global data structure and you insert into/erase from it)
I prefer the name sack though
I have a question. Does contribution gets reset after a certain period? Or it stays as it is?
I don't know, but with positive contribution, if you are inactive for a long time, it resets to 0.
How do you know so many algorithms ?
I've been doing competitive programming for 7 years. I know a lot of useless stuff.