| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 173 |
| 2 | adamant | 164 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 157 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 155 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 146 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
In 23-rd line you multiply ints up to 106. It will cause overflow. And be careful about number of digits in output.
I corrected the overflow situation but again I am getting segmentation fault. Could you please check it again? My new solution is here
You are running out of memory. Use vector instead of array with size 50k in line #99. Btw. it is not implemented optimally (complexity is with log^2 I think). I suggest you check out this algorithm with set. It is much simpler.
For example consider test where all points have the same x-coordinate. Then your program is
. It can be fixed but it's nothing fun.
I fixed the size of that array to n everytime. Got accepted now. Thanks bro.
simpler way to find closest pair: link
Similar solution with O(N log N) time https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/closest-pair-of-points-onlogn-implementation/