# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
5 | SecondThread | 148 |
5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 144 |
9 | TheScrasse | 144 |
Name |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Bichpaket (previous revision, new revision, compare).
why do you think so
have you seen those submissions, it is clear that they tried to avoid plagiarism .
You are right,sorry for my mistakes.
Code obfuscation is not encouraged, right?
fyi it's banned
[user:MikeMirzayanov]do somthing about it
Wow, very smart way of avoiding plagiarism
[user:MikeMirzayanov]why won't you ban them? Its unfair
I think the instructions (Assembly) were used to check for cheating, not the source code (text) itself.
Finally, they're getting skipped