| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3845 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3630 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3501 |
| 9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| 10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | awoo | 163 |
| 2 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | nor | 151 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 151 |
| 4 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 7 | TheScrasse | 148 |
| 8 | atcoder_official | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 144 |
Recently, I've been dealing with this problem Here
I have the same code submitted in 3 different compiler (C++ 14, C++ 17, C++ 20), you can check out all those below:
As you can see, C++ 14 is the balanced one and that's why I usually use this compiler for my submissions. What do you guys think about this ?
Where you learned this way to code centroid decomposition?
I learned from usaco and changed a little bit. Is there any problem with it ?
Maybe I would use c++17 for structured binding and c++20 for 64 bit