| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3803 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3627 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3584 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3542 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 167 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 5 | nor | 151 |
| 7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 143 |
The submission is here: 265738238
I do not think that I use significant stack memory here, it is mostly heap memory. Also I have cloned to the mashup to test with 2GB memory limits and got exactly the same result.
The code is pretty clear in my opinion but I will be happy to clarify if asked.
Thanks for your interest.
You seem to have WA on a testcase, because putting the following
ifstatement in the middle makes the code not RE but WA.So, the RE is probably due to a wrong value of
last.I think you should to divide this checking into parts with parantheses
I don't think it matters.
Thank you so much, I will focus on fixing it.
You're welcome :)
Auto comment: topic has been updated by Mr.Whitebird (previous revision, new revision, compare).
how do you train?
lol