my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 157 |
6 | maroonrk | 155 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | Petr | 146 |
8 | orz | 146 |
10 | BledDest | 145 |
my approach to this problem is:
1. build mst using prims
2. run a bfs from any special node to find the maximum edge between special nodes and that edge is the answer for all nodes.
my submission
Название |
---|
Here is an issue:
UPD: the second one should be
conn[v].size()-1
(notu
), as I understood from your code. I've just tested it, but it still gives RTE, but on test 29.UPD2: the second RTE has just been solved. The issue was in using the same
pos
for bothu
andv
. The new verdict is WA on test 33. See my submissions for more details.